158
submitted 2 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 months ago

There is simply no reason why Mozilla needs a "non-exclusive, royalty free worldwide" license to my content unless they plan on using it for their own purposes.

Firefox, running locally and under my direction, does not require a license as it is not a legal entity. It is a product.

Any argument from Mozilla to change the TOU without also removing the language for a license to your data is made in bad faith.

It's really that simple.

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
158 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

2186 readers
318 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS