906
submitted 2 months ago by tawsi@sopuli.xyz to c/peoplebluesky@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

A power balance would be more beneficial than the US rampaging without countries having other imperialists to align with.

[-] mhague@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Do you think a power imbalance or global revolution as the other commenter implies is more likely to occur than another hegemony?

If they suddenly closed prisons I wouldn't be like "hell yeah, in a just world we wouldn't need prisons, nobody should have their freedom taken away." I'd be preoccupied with what I think is going to happen in this world.

Also, every single country engages in "imperialism." It's basic geopolitics. Simply trading with people gives you influence with them that you could potentially leverage. (Remember, this topic is about soft power and influence, which some people are calling imperialism. If it's confusing don't blame me.)

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
906 points (100.0% liked)

Bluesky

1147 readers
1 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS