639
Capitalism rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Are people really thinking the government would spend money to grow weed to get people out of prison?

Seems obvious that it’s not actually inmates.

[-] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 months ago

They lease inmates to Wendy’s so I wouldn’t be surprised

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

So they’re gonna raise money to release their money makers? Thats the hitch in the thought process here.

[-] match@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago

no, i thought a pot company was leasing prisoners for a grow op and giving a portion of profits back

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You seriously thought a prison would lease its inmates to a company trying to release said inmates…?

That still doesn’t fit with the “in a prison” either.

Critical thinking is seriously lacking in this world.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago

Government? No. But I could definitely see private prison corporations making money selling prison slave labor weed.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Private prisons still operate under government oversite and with government founding….

And maybe having private prisons is its own issue entirely…?

That logic still makes no sense and is flawed at its basic starting point. A prison isn’t gonna raise money to get its inmates removed lmfao, they wouldn’t need money, they would just you know… let them out… fuck people are stupid and can’t think for more than 2 seconds.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago

I don't think people think the government is spending money to grow weed to get people out of prison, I think people thought people were paying inmates on work release or whatever to grow weed to get people out of prison.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

… so they are using their money makers to get their money makers out of prison…?

Still makes no sense that way, it’s obvious inmates have nothing to do with it.

And what part of “at a prison” means work release anyways?

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Just explaining what I thought people thought, no need to get defensive.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

And none of those people stopped to think for more than 2 seconds. That’s not even a valid line of reasoning.

A prison isn’t going to lease their inmates to a company that wants to get inmates released.

And none of that implies anything about it being “in a prison”

Critical thinking is a seriously lacking trait in today’s age….

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Empathy is also seriously lacking. Like belittling people so much over something so minor. Relax. It's not that big of a deal.

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Of course they would be spending money. That would be ridiculous. They would me MAKING money of course

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
639 points (100.0% liked)

196

17501 readers
972 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS