790
Welcome ex-Redditors!
(lemmy.world)
Come one come all to the Lemmy-verse! It's nice and cozy here, we do have some "bad parts of town" but you can do an instance block and not deal with them lol
For your memes we have !memes@lemmy.world if you like sciency posts mander.xyz has some excellent communities (communities=subreddits) like !science@mander.xyz and !biology@mander.xyz and for a meme science combo theres always the fantastic !science_memes@mander.xyz
You can also drop a shit(post) off at !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world or hang out at !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone (though you do have to post before you leave that one!)
There's much more around as well!
Obligatory, fuck Spez
Yes, I am aware AP has been whitewashing for fascists for a while. But Congress is not bound by what Moscow believes. Congress had to lift the ban on arming Nazis to send Ukraine weapons, because it’s also what the US believes.
You know who also believes Ukraine is currently governed by a Nazi regime? The soldiers covering their uniforms in Nazis patches, the politicians naming streets after Nazis, and the Ukrainians openly declaring ‘I am a Nazi.’
If the Ukraine was so Nazi, why didn't Russia go to the UN and create a multi-country coalition to remove the Nazis and save the people?
And why would these Nazis elect a Jew?
They did: https://www.rferl.org/amp/us-ukraine-vote-against-russian-resolution-condemning-nazism-united-nations-/28125450.html
Modern Nazis are far more anti-Muslim than anti-Jew. Especially if that Jewish person is a Zionist, there’s a lot of overlap in their ideology.
Why would you discredit your own proof once it’s pointed out that it isn’t proof?
Why not link directly to Ukraine’s statement?
Let’s establish the goalposts, so you can’t move them later. What would be adequately convincing, beyond a military covered in Nazi symbols and Ukrainian politicians erecting monuments of Nazis?
How is it we can correctly identify Musk is a Nazi from a salute, but y’all struggle with this mountain of evidence?
Maybe don’t say your own proof can’t be trusted and again use primary sources