7
DeepSeek: how a small Chinese AI company is shaking up US tech heavyweights.
(theconversation.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1700 readers
257 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
With fake benchmarks and censored llm, that's how.
Obviously I am hyped about DeepSeek. With that in mind:
Any proof for this?
Is ChatGPT uncensored?
No chatgpt is censored (why is it even relevant, lol), and they censored it so well that it became pretty useless last time I've used it. But even compared to other chinese llms deepseek is censored too much.
No, I don't have a proof, I've tested it a bit and replies were full of factual errors, it tried to gaslight me multiple times, in general it behaves closer to something like llama 8b from two years ago. I haven't tried the "reasoning" model yet, maybe it's really great (openai one was shit, so no high expectations here).
After understanding your opinion, your comment seem to be reasonable but was put with bad presentation, imo.
I think being cautious might be a good point here. We are very early here and we will definitely see a better benchmarks for this model as the time pass. Which will prove or disapprove their benchmarks.
Yeah, sorry, as time goes on my english gets worse. ๐บ
My English communication skills sucks also. ๐
Hopefully, both of us improve. ๐