2112

I assume "Other purposes" is govt kickbacks to mining and gas companies 😬

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

It must be so nice to see such a small bar for your defense spending.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

It's still 8.6%, that's quite a lot actually...

[-] dtxer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Thats why they lost the Emu war...

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

See those emus try the same shit in the states and see how that goes

[-] EatMyDick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah because that shit is totally not needed. AU and EU need to step up their shit. Iran and China sure are.

[-] Quatity_Control@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Except we don't want to be the USA of the Asia pacific region.

[-] EatMyDick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You people live in a fantasy world where physical threats do not exist. The US is leading the way protecting Asia and Europe. The entire balkins would be under RU is it wasn't for that spending.

The spending it's needed and it's EU/Asia doesn't step up it's game they'll ultimately be a second tier power to the United States perpetually. Their call I guess 🤷‍♂️.

[-] bigdog_00@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I mean sadly you're right - people like to hate on our defense spending in the US, but who does the world look towards when Russia invades Ukraine? It sucks that it needs to be this way, but if we don't have a strong deterrent to other countries then we're just asking for problems. Look at how aggressive China and Russia have gotten recently, with China inching closer to an invasion of Taiwan. Who's going to be laughing when the US is there to help Taiwan?

[-] Skellybones@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Also isn't usa paying for other countrys military not sure if this is true

[-] KuroJ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure why your being downvoted, but it’s true. Allied countries of the U.S. do not have to put much towards their military budget do to being able to rely on the U.S.

The U.S. has a strong military presence in the Indo-pacific region and if they didn’t, surely some adversaries would have already been having their way.

It’s unfortunate it comes to this but that’s just the facts.

[-] Version@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

People think big military = war, while in fact it‘s the opposite.

[-] Quatity_Control@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

We know more about geo politics in the region than you do. And your drastic oversimplification does not actually result in a reasonable and coherent plan for peace in the Asia pacific region. Again I'll say, your presence and commentary in this case is misinformed and incorrect.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Just wait til we buy the govt some nuc subs in the coming years, then that bar gonna be a long boi

[-] Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev 1 points 1 year ago

what’s your guess as to the percentage of US military spending compared to its tax revenue?

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2112 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17629 readers
104 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS