266
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 39 points 3 days ago

You should read the article. It's not that long, and how they figured this out is interesting.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

I would but I believe journalists should be accountable to write accurate and succinct headlines, anything less would be condoning clickbait

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago

You're right, the headline should clearly have read:

"Based on a DNA study conducted by Dr. Laura Cassidy of Trinity College Dublin and others, assumptions that most iron age Celtic societies were patrilocal have not borne out genetically, which shows that potentially there are time periods where matrilocality is more common, changing views of how women in ancient societies are viewed by modern people studying them, but this is all still early days as the paper has just been published in the science journal known as Nature and the peer review process still has to run its course. And even then, sometimes peer-reviewed science gets overturned, so we can't actually be sure any of this is true until a time machine is invented, which physicists currently think is not a practical possibility (although we haven't surveyed 100% of them on this)."

There. Accurate. Hmm... not all that succinct though.

I guess they should have gone with the title of the paper in Nature: "Continental influx and pervasive matrilocality in Iron Age Britain"

Everyone would have understood it!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
266 points (100.0% liked)

science

15242 readers
270 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS