290
submitted 2 years ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

Why would countries just ignore global authoritarian threats

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

authoritarian threats

This is a meaningless term used in this way. Every state is authoritarian, by definition. The only "state" that isn't authoritarian is anarchy, and that's only not an authoritarian state because it's not a state. Use more accurate terms if you want to make a point.

Countries are ignoring global authoritarian threats, by ignoring themselves, but that's probably not the point you were trying to make.

[-] krzschlss@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

To be global authoritarian you have to be the wealthiest and most powerful. And currently there is only one government and its army that takes this title.

[-] lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

What is a "global authoritarian"?

[-] krzschlss@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Yo, mate! Your words! I copied them from your post...

[-] lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Yes and do you understand what they mean?

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

I guess being able to trigger global nuclear war is not global enough threat for you?

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
290 points (100.0% liked)

World News

37104 readers
405 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS