944
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by hungryphrog to c/196

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kittenzrulz123 37 points 2 weeks ago

As a leftist its also important to keep in mind we do differentiate between leftists who hold some opinions we disagree with compared to a Liberal who disagrees with us on nearly everything. Especially when said Liberals demand to be treated like leftists yet support imperalism, genocide, apartheid, capitalism, bigotry, and yet constantly call people "fake leftists" or "tankies".

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago

You had me until "tankies". Tankies are scum and don't need defending.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 32 points 2 weeks ago

It's not about defending tankies it's about people who are constantly shifting the focus of conversation to the most mockable section of online lefties.

The ruling class don't waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor.

Liberals who are constantly calling people tankies are helping the ruling class.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not taking cues from the far-right in not denouncing our worst aspects when I see them and letting them take up shop in our spaces. I don't see the need to whataboutism to them either and will call that out, but I don't want them in spaces I'm in either.

[-] princessnorah 25 points 2 weeks ago

No one's defending tankies, nor saying we shouldn't call them out. The original commenter was saying liberals call all manner of leftists "tankies" when they actually aren't in order to derail them.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The next commenter stated: "The ruling class don’t waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor." Distancing themselves includes calling them out. So it sounds to me like they're saying we need to be pragmatic like the ruling class and not distance ourselves from tankies, which is absolutely not something I'm ever going to do for those slimeballs. Actively doing it like some sort of performance apropos of nothing? Sure, maybe not. But if a tankie ever tries to associate with us, they need to be given the boot over their disgusting ideals.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 11 points 2 weeks ago

I'm saying the need to instantly and constantly denounce tankies is tedious and counterproductive. I'm saying that policing the boundaries of leftism based on dumb shit said online is a reactionary distraction.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's a common strategy used to distract from the core issues. It's like when supporters of israel go "but do you condemn hamas?!" or "oh, I notice you don't criticize hamas as much (therefore you must support them)"

[-] princessnorah 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I feel like you thought they were disagreeing with you, when they were pointing out the hypocrisy of Liberals but I dunno...

[-] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Forester@pawb.social 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a political slang word. It refers to those who support leftist authoritarian regimes such as communist, China. Regimes where the state can do no wrong and the people do all the wrong so the state must step in to crush the people and "protect them" from dangerous, Western and capitalist ideas. Pretty sure the name derives from the 1989 tiananmen square incident.

[-] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 24 points 2 weeks ago

The term has nothing to do with Tiananmen square and it's usage actually predates the massacre by almost 40 years.

[-] Forester@pawb.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah you're right. I was for some reason conflating the USSR invading Hungary

[-] kittenzrulz123 5 points 2 weeks ago

You cant use your favorite strawman argument? How sad

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

And how do we do that?

This is the internet, everyone is as anonymous as they want to be. Lots of people find these posts by browsing by All, so they're not likely to be aware of (or care about) the rules for a particular instance. If a Liberal and a Leftist wander into the same community, it can be hard to tell them apart unless they've made politics their whole identity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] verdare@beehaw.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe I’m in a bubble, but I have yet to see anyone who’s not genuinely a tankie being accused of such.

[-] kittenzrulz123 9 points 2 weeks ago

Ive seen people be called tankies for not supporting Kamala and opposing Liberal Democracy

[-] verdare@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

for not supporting Kamala

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

opposing Liberal Democracy

What alternative were they in favor of?

[-] kittenzrulz123 6 points 2 weeks ago

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

World users were literally calling anyone who critiqued Kamala Russian bots, were you not paying attention for the last several months?

What alternative were they in favor of?

Depends, some leftists support a workers democracy, im personally an Anarcho Syndicalist

[-] verdare@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

World users

Ah. I think I see where the problem is. I believe my instance defederated from lemmy.world a while back.

[-] kittenzrulz123 4 points 2 weeks ago

You arent missing out on much

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

I've seen conservatives lob the word tankie around before like they do with other scary sounding political words. But not here on lemmy. "Tankie" has a very precise meaning on lemmy that everyone here seems to understand, despite a few tankies trying to gaslight people into thinking the term has "lost it's meaning".

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a strange state of affairs, there is a right wing recruitment pipeline deticated to making fun of liberals for being "cringe but also wrong"™.

An interesting experament you can do, replace "leftist", "the left" and "liberal" with "SJW" (swap the insider and outsider language) and ask yourself how much and in what interesting ways does the sentimate of the post change.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Damn SJWs supporting checks notes imperialism, bigotry and capitalism

[-] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Interesting, highly synthetic (in this case right wing "Woke SJW") propaganda becomes clearly fraudulent when material complaints like yours arise.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

yet support imperalism, genocide, apartheid, capitalism, bigotry

Yeah as a liberal I resent this. Im against all of these things except that I believe that the world is capitalist and would probably not be really any different even with a sudden communist takeover. Power corrupts any system just like it always has so you need safegaurds and checks that our system did have until everyone decided to throw out baby with the bath water

There are ideas i like that are communist(social programs, centralized production, not a huge fan of not owning my own stuff, but i dont think businesses should really own land), but i believe there is a lot of resistance to it and a slow burn towards utopia is a more fruitful endeavor.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

safegaurds and checks that our system did have

Uh... Assuming you're from the west. The US was founded on slavery and genocide, and western Europe got to where it is through colonialism. What checks and safeguards did our countries ever have?

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Checks and balances, regulation and with a united constituency you would have more accountable politicians. Instead we got the left and right doing the splits so hard we got the rich lefties hopping ship to the right

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123 4 points 2 weeks ago

Have you heard of Market Socialism?

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

An idea with merits but again corruptable. Profits still exist but they go back to the cooperativee? The co-op would have to be uncorruptable or it would end up just like a corporation

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

not a huge fan of not owning my own stuff

Communism is when I own your toothbrush. Hand it over liberal.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Come and get it 😄

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
944 points (100.0% liked)

196

16841 readers
1743 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS