105
submitted 3 months ago by MelonYellow@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.world

His answer is the octopus. What say you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

They are marine which makes fire impossible which severely limits industrial advancement. Similarly they are not social animals which negates a lot of the division of labour advantages of a society. While a species of octopus might advance intellectually to ponder its own existence I doubt it could achieve the infrastructure necessary to significantly control its environment.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Don't forget that they only live 1-2 years. 3 tops. I think this is even more limiting than fire. And if evolutionary pressure leads to longer lifespans somehow, they must overcome the whole dying after mating thing.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

True, also they do not raise offspring which means zero communication of non-instinctive knowledge between generations.

[-] Lightcrater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

They could use the underwater volcanoes to smeltle the meltle though, thought of that? Checkmate.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

We have terrestrial volcanoes, how far would human civilisation advanced if they were our only source of fire.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
105 points (100.0% liked)

science

18127 readers
204 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS