189
First demonstration of quantum teleportation over busy Internet cables
(news.northwestern.edu)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
189 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
61300 readers
3606 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The article starts by doing the "quantum" thing that really irks me, where they use confusing terminology to make it sound like "FTL communication" without actually saying it. This is garbage that doesn't actually matter to the article.
Basically, they found a way to send quantum entangled photons (which exist in a very delicate unobserved state) through existing fiber optic infrastructure without interfering with the standard internet information already travelling through the fiber. A lot of the difficulty with this is due to signal noise that needs to be filtered out. This will be useful communicating quantum measurements over long distances.
"Only limited by the speed of light..."
They then go on to describe what sounds like
transmitting a single specific photon through ‘the internet’, implying start-to-finish with routing (not possible without special infrastructure)
Use that photon to then send information instantly by manipulating its entangled sibling (also not possible)
So yeah this article is a crock of shit.
The article did not describe either of those things that way. Cynicism is overriding reading comprehension.
It should be a legal requirement to link the actual research paper at the top of science articles
2nd paragraph wasn't good enough, huh?
I didn’t say they didn’t link the paper.
I've seen a lot of articles that were like "scientists do this!!" And never link to the actual study (not including this article)
What happened to citing your sources?