81
[R] Stupidest ways people have solved coding interviews
(loops.video)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
81 points (100.0% liked)
Fun Loops ▶️
946 readers
1 users here now
Posting interesting/cool/funny videos from Loops here
Thanks to @Bluefruit@lemmy.world for the icon and banner!
Discussion of and questions about Loops should go over in !loops@lemmy.world
If the loop you're posting isn't original content uploaded by the creator, prefix the title with ♻️ or [R] (if you don't feel like typing an emoji) for "reposted". For example, ♻️ Cute dog or [R] Cute dog.
Note that some loopers upload their loops to multiple platforms including Loops, so you might see insta/tiktok logos on videos that aren't marked as reposts.
If you know the source for a loop marked ♻️/[R], please comment with it!
Rules:
- Don't be a dick
- Don't make me add more rules
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
That sort is pretty bonkers. I agree with the no hire because it doesn’t really display an understanding but if I got that as an answer in a technical interview, it would be fun to dive into why that code was written and might turn into a hire if we peer just a bit deeper under the hood of the thinking. This is why “solve for x” technical questions suck unless you make the actual interview about the back and forth. Assume a correct premise if it works and tweak and change and poke and prod to really sus out if they understand what and why that was written.