743
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Carrying a gun is "premeditated self defence"? Are people only supposed to carry guns where it is safe? What is the purpose of that?

So many people pushing this ridiculous idea he is guilty for not staying at home, quaking in his boots. Right to self defense and to bear arms literally exist so that people don't have to fear walking outside because of asshat violent criminals and rioters.

And even more ridiculous saying the police and prosecutors didn't care. What do you mean? They went after him with everything they had. It was a jury of his peers that told them to f off with that shit.

But I guess lemmy only likes juries if they nullify actual murderers they like, not when they let go an innocent person they don't like. (I don't like Rittenhouse either, but that does not make him a murderer.)

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

I remember when I was a freshman in high school, I worked at a McDonald’s. For whatever reason, I owned a Burger King t shirt. As a 14 year old, I thought it would be funny to wear the Burger King shirt to work. I figured it would annoy my boss and might get a few reactions out of other people. It didn’t work, but there were no real consequences because of it.

You really can’t see how Rittenhouse did a similar thing? He went to a protest knowing he was diametrically opposite, politically, to people actually protesting and he did it with a big ass gun. Like my Burger King t shirt, this was very clearly sending a message of “I am your enemy.” And the message wasn’t on a harmless shirt, it was on a deadly big ass gun.

You really truly believe he had no intention of killing? Are you dumb?

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You really truly believe he had no intention of killing? Are you dumb?

Cops bring guns to risky arrests. Do you believe they have intention of killing? I do, at least conditionally, yes. As in they absolutely intend to kill the guy being arrested if he pulls a weapon. Almost everyone that carries a gun has the intention of shooting anyone who attacks them. That is the point of a gun.

Like my Burger King t shirt, this was very clearly sending a message of “I am your enemy.”

I don't know if he was hoping to shoot someone or if he expected to just intimidate them and didn't expect anyone would be dumb enough to start attacking a guy with a big ass gun. From legal perspective, I don't care, hoping for something is not illegal.

From whether Rittenhouse is an asshole, I already said I think he is anyway.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Rittenhouse was not a cop, he was a douchebag little shit stirrer with a murder fantasy, and he got exactly what he wanted — a fun murder spree killing liberals with no consequences.

I’m not going to coordinate an effort to lynch the piece of shit, but spreading bullshit about how “he’s not a murderer,” like what you’re doing, is disingenuous at best. Kindly, shut the fuck up

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He got exactly what he wanted — a fun murder spree killing liberals with no consequences.

He killed two violent assholes who not only thought attacking people on the streets for their opinions is acceptable, but were dumb enough to attack and keep attacking someone with a gun in his hands. I give zero shits about if he wanted to do it.

It was not murder, since murder means killing illegally, which this was not. Not even if he was hoping they would attack him and went there for that purpose.

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It was not murder, since murder means killing illegally

You could have picked from so many different reasons to why this was not murder, but this one takes the cake.

I have another one!

Murder is a crime, and Criminals are in Jail.

Since he is not, it could not have been murder! CHECKMATE LIBERALS /s

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What the fuck do you mean? Murder, as most words, has a definition. I don't pick what a word means based on how I feel about a topic.

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nothing!

Please keep talking about what murder is! I really need to know.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Violent bloodthirsty evil thug, then. Is that better for you, Herr Pedant?

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Whether someone is supposed to be in prison is not pedantism.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Orchestrating a scenario in which the only possible outcome is self-defense by deadly force sounds an awful lot like premeditated murder, to me. I think you should reevaluate what you consider pedantry.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So people attacking him for his opinions is the only possible outcome? Has your brain rotted away?

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People attacked him because he had a big gigantic deadly gun and was goading a literal angry mob with the gun.

It’s now more clear to me than ever that you are intentionally acting in bad faith. What is wrong with you?

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People are attacking him because he has a big gigantic deadly gun

He has a right to carry a gigantic gun.

goading

Carrying a gun is not considered goading by any sane person.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It absolutely is considered goading. If lifting your shirt to reveal a gun holstered can be considered a threat (one that police can legally shoot you over) then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

He didn’t go there to make his voice heard — he went there to intimidate and kill.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

If a person threatens someone and gets attacked, he cannot claim self-defense. The jury decided he did not threaten them. It would have been murder otherwise and he would be in prison.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The jury also decided OJ Simpson was innocent. Get fucked, boot licker

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So why don't we have you decide instead of juries? You clearly know better than the rest of the population. /s

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

/uj

If every version of you present on a jury could be replaced with someone like me, the justice system would probably function better than it does now.

/rj

Get fucked, bootlicker.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
743 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

10530 readers
292 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS