The difference is, that Netflix (or Spotify, or whatever) does bring value on its own. I am paying money to comfortably and legally stream content, which itself is paid for and licensed by the streaming provider. From the perspective of a lazy end user, it's worth it, because you do not need to care about downloading, finding releases, opsec and whatnot. I don't want to protect Netflix, fuck corporations and subscription services, but password sharing was always only tolerated at most. From the same end user perspective, reddit is just an empty platform. The content is brought in free of charge by the community. And now not only they want the same community to pay, but also for an objectively worse experience? I don't think that you can compare that.

I can somewhat understand both perspectives. Although I too sail the high seas, if you don’t have the aptitude to self host, and you only care to binge a show over the weekend, $12 (or whatever it costs now) is a somewhat justifiable expense. I mean, 1 comic book is $4-$6 on average these days. One of those might provide 15 minutes of entertainment and a month of anticipation. $12 is a good value.

Weirdly, I've been using my parents' Netflix credentials still and haven't been kicked off yet. They live hours away so there's no mistake there about being in the same household.

Hopefully I'm not tempting fate too much by talking about it on the Internet lol

Thinking people are retarded because they don’t pirate or self-host. Most people don’t have the time, room, energy to do it, you must be a genius

I find it a tad arrogant to believe costumers can't make rational decision that differ from those of the vocal online minority of reddit et al. Whenever a website changes its product (arguably for the worse, most of the time) said minority prophesizes the end, and calls out some kind of revolt, whereas the vast majority of users or ~~costumers~~ customers just makes due with the slightly worsened conditions, simply because they still see the product as worthwhile. Netflix, for all its flaws, still is a decent product for a decent price, as long as you're into the kind of slop they produce. And there probably is a large portion of ~~costumers~~ customers who weren't even affected at all by the recent changes.

Posting for it is still easier than learning how to pirate and dodging lawsuits.

My GF pays for Netflix and other than some annoying messages and text account sharing is still possible, not as cool as before though.

Anyway, as she does not have the premium version, or whatever is called (no 4K) good quality picture films we end up watching them on Stremio lol.

She doesn't care, but I do.

I kept paying for a little while, until I had ripped everything off their site I wanted to see, then I cancelled lol.

Well, why would they ditch for piracy? Netflix was smart about the whole thing: adding an authorized household (not user, entire household) is cheaper than creating a new subscription. The people subscribing to Netflix aren't fundamentally opposed to paying for streaming, they were opposed to an unfair change in the business model. Netflix countered with a seemingly fair change in the business model that now eliminates the hassles that come with password sharing and could make the marginal increase in cost per household fairly small. It was overall a pretty smart business decision.

There are many many problems with Netflix, including their growth-based business model, the lack of insight into their finances, and the way they're slowly enshittifying the film industry. They're a major reason for the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes. However, this change wasn't stupid and people weren't stupid for going along with it. I don't see how it would lead to an overall increase in piracy, that's being driven by the many new streaming services forcing costs on consumers. But consumers won't blame Netflix for that because, frankly, that's not Netflix's fault.