878
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago

The purpose of copyright is to encourage the creation of art to enrich society. Making money for copyright holders is a means to an end, not the end itself.

We need a new copyright law that shifts media to public domain if the copyright holder no longer makes it available.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Copyright and patent law is a social contract and a very fundamental one.

United States Constitution has some pretty cool ideas in it. Freedom of speech? That the government cannot punish you for expressing an idea? That was added as an afterthought. Freedom of religion? That congress shall make no law establishing a religion, making our society secular and preventing the government from punishing those who do not conform? Afterthought. The right to a trial by jury of peers, the right to not be compelled to testify against yourself, the right to be secure in your person and property? Afterthoughts. All of that, all of the things we call the Bill Of Rights, were added on the basis of "Wait we should probably have this."

The basis of intellectual property law isn't in an amendment, it's too important. It's in the main body of the constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 Intellectual property:

To promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respecive Writings and Discoveries.

We The People grant creators for a time exclusive right of way over their creations to monetize and profit from them as incentive for doing the work of creation so that we may have the creations, after which the creation becomes the heritage of all mankind forever so that other creators in the future may build upon it. Americans tend to view our first amendment right to freedom of speech, broadly defined by our supreme court to include symbolic speech to include overt actions such as burning a flag, as near absolute. Even the allegedly liberal allegedly enlightened democracies in Europe will outlaw ideas; America will not. Copyright and patent law is one of the very few where we will limit speech or the press, for it is one of the few laws that came before the first amendment. You may not be free to print an idea if it currently belongs to someone else.

Without that incentive, the ability to personally profit form the works you create, you get the Soviet Union, which invented...Tetris. Whose inventor didn't earn a single kopek from his invention until he became an American citizen. Without the expiration date for copyrights or patents you get...Disney. Who gobbles up creative works without the intention of letting go with the apparent goal of monopolizing the very idea of storytelling itself, hoarding wealth in perpetuity and simply buying any competition.

For a society to properly function it is important for patents and copyrights to be temporary in nature; they must exist and yet they must within a lifetime cease to exist. Lack of either condition is an intolerable rot. Copyright terms being the lifetime of the author plus seventy years is a rot the United States probably has not survived. I think we're soon to find out.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

My only critique is you seem to downplay Tetris like it isnt one of the greatest games ever developed. You are right in that Pajitnov had to straight up move to have any right to reward from it. Also the Soviet Union had to collapse

Tetris is a cool game, sure, but my point is the Soviet Union had a short list of hit video games. Name 5 other famous Soviet video games. Not a major exporter of cultural works.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

While you're right, its a really poor way to phrase that. Compare to something like, "In 69 years, the Soviets only managed to make Tetris, and even then the creator didnt see a cent until he emigrated to America".

Could also mention how they failed to keep up with American computing

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That is an excellent write up! Well done OP!

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

In an ideal society sure, we don’t live in an ideal society

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Then whats the purpose of existence if not to strive for a more ideal society?

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago

Profit for a ever dwindling number of individuals. /$

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I think your comment is the most succinct summary in and of itself. It exists like a perfect quote from Greek philosophy. I was purely pointing out the broken issue of copyright as it exists.

The point of existence is to struggle for better existence in some schools of thought as you’ve summarized.

In others, it’s to realize that by struggling through cycles of existence you are not aware of the trap of existence, like Zen Buddhism.

In traditional Abrahamic schools of thought it’s to honor God enough and follow your creed that you get rewarded after you die.

I think the way I feel about existence is more Nihilist. Something like https://youtu.be/E_qvy82U4RE

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I was where you were, a nothing matters, what's the point nihilist. But I learned that I had skills and talents that could help people. Ended up going to law school and now I helping folks.

I believe every person can put their pants on in the morning and go out and make their local community just a little bit better. People get caught up in macro morals but just giving your neighbor a plate of Thanksgiving goods goes such a long way.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh hey don’t get me wrong. I switched my job from an ad agency to an emergency management SaaS company that was crucial during COVID to ensure vaccines went out to people when they should have and continues to have beneficial applications. I took a big pay cut, but the work is far more fulfilling.

I’m by no means saying we should treat our lives as if nothing matters, and I apologize that it came off that way. I think moreso my message was that there’s no great creed or so we can look to for guidance. Wake up every day, do your best to help others, then sign off of the toxicity that is most social media and do your best to treat yourself and those you care about with love. Go to sleep, and rinse and repeat.

But just don’t expect some magic eureka moment of where it gets easier. We’re all just struggling, and unfortunately I don’t think the forces we struggle against like greed will ever go away.

Cheers, thanks for the discourse, and I hope you find yourself with increasing happiness as the days flow by

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Damn, I enjoyed reading this wholesome conversation.

[-] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yea, I always liken nihilism to being an asshole, because you reap the rewards, however small or large, of peoples' labour who didn't think that way. The least you can do is pay it forward, so it's more an obligation then anything else.

[-] Plagiatus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Sure you can buy this - for just $1000000 you can watch this movie on Amazon.

Technically it's available.

[-] gerbler@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This is why the word "reasonable" comes up in a lot of laws. "What counts as reasonable?" You ask? This is what judges are for; to examine the circumstances and make a judgement call.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
878 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19676 readers
530 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS