2962
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. I hardcore disagree with conservatives as a libertarian socialist myself, but I always want to hear what people who disagree with me (and people who agree with me) are saying, and engage in civil conversation with people who actually believe what they say.

The problem for me comes when shills (people who don't believe what they say but get paid to say it) come into the conversation, or when people use outright disingenuous arguments (usually strawmans).

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Assuming any conservative is arguing in good faith is your first mistake.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You very well may be correct, but I always like to assume people are good and are arguing in good faith until proven otherwise.

If I can "steelman" (opposite of strawman) their position, and argue against it easilly, I see no reason not to do so, and that also makes for a better argument for other people viewing the comment thread who may believe the false notion that climate change is either fake or not caused by humans.

To me, trying to argue that climate change is fake or not caused by humans is the same as trying to argue that the Earth is flat. Very easy to debunk.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

That is a recipe for wasting a huge amount of time in people whose main goal is to waste your time.

[-] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You mean like the disinformation that this user is literally spreading in this very thread?

If they actually believe it, I would like to argue the factual point, which is very easy to do. If they don't believe what they are saying, then yes, I have a problem with it.

There is plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that climate change is real and that it is caused by humans. If they choose to not listen to evidence and hard facts, then they lost the debate. If they say that big money funded those studies, simply point them to the Big Oil-funded studies claiming that climate change is false, and the fact that they originally found that it was true, and then tried to bury it.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

People posting the same few thoroughly debunked ideas over and over gets really old.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
2962 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39395 readers
1774 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS