732
submitted 3 days ago by sunnie@sopuli.xyz to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Why would it be a hazard or remarkable or even something special that it "made through"… It's just a mascot, and a good one as well

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because it's very very obviously a fursona

[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

… and?

Why would that be a hazard or remarkable or even something special that it “made through”… It’s just a (furry) mascot, and a good one as well

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's not something that's generally appropriate for a government to post, or anyone in a professional setting.

[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Because…? In what way is a fursona not "aPpRoPrIaTe"? That literally just describes half of all mascots, furry is essentially just an antropomorphic animal. Again, you haven't given any real reason why there would be anything wrong with this, at all.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Because a furry is a sexual fetish/kink and a mascot is not typically a fetish or kink.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
732 points (100.0% liked)

196

16542 readers
2051 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS