324
Liberal rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 week ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I'm not just complaining about the laissez-faire liberals, but the self identified liberals who remain ignorant of how far we actually needed to go into democratic socialism to stand a chance. I even underestimated how much radical reform was needed to sustain liberal democracy. Even self identified liberals and progressive did not push hard enough. As someone who felt the urge to shy away from radical reform, I now know that it was necessary yesterday.

We needed business owners OUT of conversations as owners of businesses; no more entrepreneurship or private interests. We needed DEprivatization and regulations that STARTED at the Green New Deal. We needed the stock market to perpetually remain stagnant as wages rose. We needed effective wealth redistribution, not so we could reach communism, but so people would continue to buy into the system. We needed an FDR, but got a party of Herbert Hoovers.

We refused to dream big enough out of fear of being filthy commies, but that's what would have been necessary to hold back fascism and keep liberalism. Now we have the unenviable task of surviving fascism, clawing back control from the rich out of the remains of an empire, and suffering from an apocalyptic climate crisis for the rest of our lives. We're not doomed, but we are cursed.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
324 points (100.0% liked)

196

16573 readers
1686 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS