246

Get rid of Threads without blocking it (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 11 months ago by JupiterRowland@sh.itjust.works to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

See also here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] scott@authorship.studio 11 points 11 months ago

I was thinking about that the other day. Most fediverse servers won't even qualify to be federated with Threads. Especially single user instances, since they are unlikely to have a privacy policy for themselves and a public stream.

[-] JupiterRowland@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

And they can only connect to Threads because Meta doesn't want to go after thousands of private single-user instances, clutter their blocklist with them and check every once in a while if they still exist to keep it from being clutterted too much.

Also, at least on Hubzilla and (streams), it's the single-user instances that are likely to have an actually public pubstream. But not necessarily the federated one that Threads wants.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024

246 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse memes

2161 readers

130 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General

Be respectful
Post on topic
No bigotry or hate speech
Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users

Specific

We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.

Addendum: Yes we know that you think ml/hexbear/grad are tankies and or .world are a bunch of liberals but it gets old quickly. Try and come up with new material.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

BoozeOrWater@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

Emperor@feddit.uk

wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk