345
submitted 11 months ago by rikudou@lemmings.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I am skeptical that researchers and reviewers of Science wouldn't have accounted for that. I made some research about rebuttal to this study, so far the only ones I have found are from farmer related or anti-vegan communities, which are likely more biased than a scientific journal. I will need at least a contradictory peer reviewed article to convince me this meta analysis is incorrect.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

if the source material can't convince you, then live in ignorance

[-] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

When you are not an expert of the domain, it is easy to get mislead by arguments such as the one you gave, maybe you're correct, maybe you're misleading, I don't have the knowledge to verify by myself. That's why I need to rely on reputable source, and it's hard to do more reputable than a meta-analysis in Science. If you are correct, the rebuttal will eventually be published in a peer reviewed journal, I'll will be happy to read the conclusions then.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

it's stated explicitly in the papers cited by poore-nemecek. all you need to do is read

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
345 points (100.0% liked)

science

21987 readers
195 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS