345
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 132 points 1 week ago
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you think pigs, chickens and cows have the same level of awareness and perception as broccoli, tomatoes or potatoes than you're the potato.

Humans have to eat and with the exception of a few minerals like salt, everything edible to humans is alive on some level. Vegansisn is making an ethical choice about reducing what causes the most pain fear and suffering in another. If I were to develop cancer, a tape worm or a virus should I also allow those living things to thrive as well or does "Uh, now what?" also apply to antibiotics?

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

How about I just get to eat meat because I consider it far more humane to be more efficient about proteins? And eggs and cheeses are more efficient with all sorts of aminos.

As much as I respect vegans I also don't agree with their approach. I am of the opinion (as is most biologists) that we are omnivores.

[-] heraplem@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

How about I just get to eat meat because I consider it far more humane to be more efficient about proteins?

What does this have to do with anything? This is bringing efficiency to an ethics fight.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not fighting. I find it annoying to have to eat 16 times the amount of normal peanut butter as one chicken breast. It's pure math.

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (109 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
345 points (100.0% liked)

science

14806 readers
120 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS