104
Rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by SafCack@lemmy.world to c/196

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anothercatgirl 32 points 2 years ago

This is why some form of multi-select is needed on ballots. Maybe rank the candidates by which is your favorite. Maybe checkboxes for every candidate you're okay with winning.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago

Ranked choice. You basically get 6 votes. Your #1 pick gets 3 votes, your #2 gets 2, your #3 gets 1.

Just call them points instead of votes. Voting is the action of making your three picks and you’re only allowed to do that once.

[-] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

Lookup Single Transferable Vote

[-] chumbalumber 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Or just do a normal proportional parliament in which each party gets as many seats relative to how many votes it gets.

I mean that doesn't work for Presidential elections, you need Ranked Choice voting for that, but still, having a real democracy for the parliaments instead of FPTP would be much better.

[-] ophy@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 years ago

Yep, Mixed Member Proportional system means that you get to elect someone to represent your area, and know that the overall makeup of the parliament will be proportional to the overall party votes received.

And as you mention, a form of ranked choice voting is still needed for any "finite seat" vote, such as local representatives, where you're electing individuals rather than groups.

FPTP is a horrendous system and all it does is incentivise strategic voting, which is problematic because ideally we should all vote for whatever suits our interests and beliefs, without worrying about whether our votes are being wasted.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

196

17445 readers
601 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS