509
The future is now (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Sentient and capable of suffering are two different things.

Technically true, but in the opposite way to what you're thinking. All those capable of suffering are by definition sentient, but sentience doesn't necessitate suffering.

Whether they can feel suffering like ants can is an unsolved scientific question

No it isn't, unless you subscribe to a worldview in which sentience could exist everywhere all at once instead of under special circumstances, which would demand you grant ethical consideration to every rock on the ground in case it's somehow sentient.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago

Show drag a scientific paper demonstrating that ants or animals of similar intelligence can't suffer. You're claiming the problem is solved, show the literature.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Did you just refer to yourself in the third person again? Why?

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago

No, drag didn't refer to dragself in the third person.

[-] mostdubious@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

drag needs to wait until they are 18 if they expect adults to take them seriously.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
509 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

2598 readers
136 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS