364
submitted 10 months ago by 101@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unless they're finding exciting new and efficient ways to generate electricity, I imagine its a linear comparison. Maybe some are worse than others. I know Grok's datacenter in Mississippi is relying exclusively on portable gas powered electric generators that are wrecking havoc on the local environment.

[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

I didn't know that; thanks for sharing.

(BTW, I think you meant wreaking havoc.)

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

All my misspellings are part of my charm.

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

Gas like natural gas? Or gas like gasoline? I'm sure it's the former, but I take nothing for granted anymore.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Maybe this is the push we need to switch to nuclear. The attack is good it just needs somebody with deeper pockets than coal/gas to lobby it.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Microsoft is trying to restart Three Mile Island. But that's a very old facility. I don't see too much interest in building new ones.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Kind of. Microsoft is offering to buy the electricity and put jobs and data centers nearby, the state is reactivating the site.

If more AI companies dedicate to buying vast amounts of electricity, there's money and jobs in it

But if they eye companies start making concentrated demand, It won't people with deep pockets long to figure out how to turn up some small scale high output plants.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If more AI companies dedicate to buying vast amounts of electricity, there’s money and jobs in it

Google the history of the Vogtle 3 and 4 reactors in Georgia. I don't think tech firms have 16 years to invest in new energy plants.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Honestly you can thank decades of anti-nuclear lobbying

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

More the plunge in O&G prices during the 1980s. Coal, oil, and natural gas got incredibly cheap under Reagan after the US cut sweetheart deals with the Saudis. Nuclear has huge upfront development costs, while oil, gas, and coal are very cheap to start up and run incredibly high margins.

Lobbying and activism had very little impact, as evidenced by the campaigns against coal waste and gas flaring and strip mining that all fell flat.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
364 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
2699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS