523

submitted 2 months ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

At least if the company is run from the US

[-] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Everyone knows it's impossible for the NSA to buy rack space in Bulgaria, where they literally don't have to deal with any US legal process.

It's also impossible for the NSA to market such a service via pop-privacy blogs and social media profiles.

The funny part about this is that the Snowden leaks showed that the NSA actually put a lot of effort into doing shit like this specifically to avoid all the paperwork which came with accidentally collecting data from US citizens. Keeping the data and analysis off shore means no pesky FISA paperwork.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

Why?

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

Because if the government wants that data then they are gonna get it. If it's in another country its a lot more work than just serving them a warrant like it is if they are USbased

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago

At least that's a more reasonable answer than trying to imply the NSA has backdoors everywhere.

My position is that it all depends on your threat model. The government isn't likely to go after someone who torrents files and is hidden by a VPN. The government might go after someone running a streaming site, on the other hand.

And even that might wind up with a dead end. AirVPN (for example) is Canada-based, has no logs, and accepts both crypto and anonymous cash payments.