858
Linux rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by yogurtwrong@lemmy.world to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

I've always looked at Linux users as the vegans of the computer world. You know they have a point but holy shit can shut up about it for like 5 minutes?

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 2 months ago

You dont know the ones who don't talk about it constantly.

Applies to both Linux users and vegans.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

True I know, in both cases, the annoying type are a vocal minority.

[-] beliquititious 17 points 2 months ago

I think there is just a portion of humans that love feeling morally superior, I imagine if annoying vegans or open source zealots tried crossfit they'd never shut up about that either.

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Ironically this comment kind of implies an air of superiority over those who enjoy feeling superior, ever completing the infinite circle.

[-] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago

I'm a Linux user and I cross fit. I'm terrible at it and it means I'm sore all the time, but I'm trying. I don't tell many people because I'm really struggling with it, but I want at least a small amount of physical fitness to keep up with my kids

[-] beliquititious 6 points 2 months ago

Sure and I would imagine most linux users, vegans, and crossfitters are like you. But those three all have notably annoying individuals in thier ranks and I was meaning that annoying people are annoying, not that there is anything wrong with veganism, open source, or physical health

[-] muix@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

What does crossfit have to do with morality?

[-] beliquititious 6 points 2 months ago

Nothing, the point I was making is that annoying vegans and linux users would be annoying know-it-alls who never shut up about what they love and feel strongly about regardless of what activity they engage in. Crossfit also has zealots that are famously annoying, so it seemed like an easy way to illustrate my point without getting in the weeds like I have done now. Nothing to do with moral philosophy, annoying people are annoying.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That does explain why there are always outspoken vegans inside my echo chambers.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I think in both cases you have a small and vocal minority within the group. Then you have the silent majority who never preach but just enjoy the lifestyle and the benefits it brings them.

[-] FJW@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

I don’t think I’ve ever met a vegan who talked about it in contexts outside of organizing food for multiple people or in response to others asking about it.

I think it’s mostly that non-vegetarians (of whom I am one) know deep down that at least the vegetarians[1] are right and that they don’t like being reminded of their moral failings. Thus every time they plan getting food for a group and the vegans mention their culinary restrictions, they feel attacked and try to compensate for it by blaming the vegans.

[1] I’ve encountered to many people reporting that they experienced serious health issues with going full vegan, so I’m very much not convinced that veganism is something that works for everyone long term. The same issues do however clearly not apply to vegetarianism.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
858 points (100.0% liked)

196

16563 readers
1565 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS