155
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by nifty@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

If depression is the emotional expression of the immobilization response, then the solution is to move out of that state of defense. Porges believes it is not enough to simply remove the threat. Rather, the nervous system has to detect robust signals of safety to bring the social state back online. The best way to do that? Social connection.

For people who don’t prefer social connection, I’ve seen that exercise works well

Edit: just want to highlight that polyvagal theory, the main point behind this article, is unsubstantiated thus far

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyvagal_theory

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

I get more depression around people. I do better in the woods all by myself. My protection is to get away from people. I don't feel lonely or alienated in solitude.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People don't depress me, but I only have so much charge on my social battery. And yeah, seems we're the odd ones regarding the outdoors. When people first meet me, they often comment about my running around the creeks and swamps alone.

"Aren't you worried about (panthers, gators, bears, serial killers) ?!"

"Uh, no, they're rare enough and I carry a gun if it comes to it."

Great. On top of thinking me fruity, now I'm an armed fruit.

[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Here people ask if I'm worried about bears. No , they're worried about me. You're way more likely to get mugged in the city than mauled in the woods. I have bear spray just in case.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

City people might be at greater risk, being more likely to start filming if they see a bear. Or trying to get a selfie with it.

Less likely to do that with a mugger! Lol

[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, look at the cute bear. Idiots.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What's wrong with responsibly owning a firearm?

I really fucking hate this culture of us Left-leaning people looking at firearm ownership as stupid; meanwhile we are surrounded by armed unhinged racists, bible-thumping violent anti-LGBTQ religious fanatics, skinhead right-wing cops and we hope those fascist protect us if Republicans riot violently.

So fucking dumb to think deterrence is bad.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Context. Open carrying an ak47 in walmart in a suburb is weird and douchey and should be criticized. Keeping a shotgun at your cabin in the woods or carrying a sidearm while hiking in the middle of nowhere is smart.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Open carrying an ak47 in walmart in a suburb is weird

Is this an exaggeration for effect, or something that's actually legal in some places?

[-] Skydancer@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, it's legal in much of the US. Many states require a permit for concealed carry, but not for open carry. WalMart has signs at the front of the store "requesting" people not to open carry, but apparently not prohibiting it.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Lmao. That's freakin' bizarre.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

That's also freakin' bizarre to me! Lol

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

US defaultism? In most western countries people don't, and aren't allowed to, carry guns.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
155 points (100.0% liked)

science

14786 readers
44 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS