617
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago

I have lots of friends that are vegan/have been vegan, or are sympathetic to the cause. IRL I have had some wonderful conversations about veganism and the ethics of our diet. But on the Internet it's the vegans ironically that need to get out and touch grass. It's like there's no nuance to any conversation, like sorry I can be Peter Singer, it's actually kinda difficult to be that moral.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago

This. My experience has been that internet vegans are more concerned with judging others than caring about animals.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

But on the Internet it’s the vegans ironically that need to get out and touch grass.

I keep hearing about these crazy vegans from other folks complaining on the internet. I never actually get to meet them in the wild.

But if I flip over to YouTube Recommended Feed I can find Liver King tier content all the fuck over the front page. Definitely try to steer clear of anything "Recommended" these days, but if I had my ear-holes getting saturated with JBP / Joe Rogan Carnivore Diet insanity 24/7, that might wear down my ability to have a polite conversation.

Maybe that's what other people are seeing out on the YT comments sections?

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Here on Lemmy I've been accused of torturing and raping animals as I'm unashamedly an omnivore. I'm a hunter as well.

I worry about animal suffering enough that we've bought a small farm and hope to raise all our own meat. I've actually worked on factory farms and know firsthand the suffering of animals under that system.

However, there are fanatical vegans on Lemmy that do a fantastic job of driving away those of us sympathetic to vegan ethics and morality.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Here on Lemmy I’ve been accused of torturing and raping animals

I’ve actually worked on factory farms

Depending on what all you did to the animals at those factory farms, you might have been torturing and raping animals. I did horseback riding for like 7 years of my life. I don't deny I was an animal abuser. The only thing I can do about it now is never get on a horses back again. Denying I was ever doing abuse won't help me.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

RAPE! RAPE! MURDER!!!!1!

This bullshit doesn't help your cause at all. I'm the rare omnivore that is actually sympathetic to moral issues of factory farmig and animal suffering.

You need to like unfuck your head and try to turn down whatever preaching you're listening to. That's some bad religion that's got ahold of you.

You're no different than those 'pro-life' whack jobs.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Here on Lemmy I’ve been accused of torturing and raping animals as I’m unashamedly an omnivore

I'm sorry to hear that. Online discourse does get extremely personal, particularly when people don't know each other.

I’ve actually worked on factory farms and know firsthand the suffering of animals under that system

Well then... not to be rude but that means you've literally been complicit in torturing and raping animals.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There it is.

So, as an ignorant teenager, cleaning chicken houses of rotten corpses and chicken shit for $5/hr: I was actually fucking those chickens? I was kid chicken raper? The steers I raised in elementary school, I suppose I fucked them as well.

See, that's the thing. I saw how bad it was and have worked and saved for many years so I will no longer have to participate in a system that involves industrial suffering.

But nope, I'm totally such a raper. Fuck you and your sanctimonious bullshit. You don't know me or my circumstances. I know plenty of Southern Baptists and Church of Christ that spew this same shit. Y'all would get along real well, if you only listened to your tones and didn't pay attention to the words.

Fucking fanatics can suck my fucking balls, all y'all the same.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

So, as an ignorant teenager, cleaning chicken houses of rotten corpses and chicken shit for $5/hr: I was actually fucking those chickens? I was kid chicken raper?

I would like to think "I saw the horrors and really learned something" would be the appropriate response, not "I saw the horrors, so now I'm immune to criticism for eating meat."

But I do begin to see why vegans upset you so much.

[-] cash@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

If you're trying to make a point for there not being as many "crazy vegans" on the internet, well, you're fucking it up.

[-] Ostrakon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

You don't see them in the wild because they're terminally online babies who can only exist in an internet bubble, and likely don't represent anything but a tiny fraction of vocal, obtuse jerkoffs compared to the population of vegans.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You don’t see them in the wild because they’re terminally online babies

I still don't know who you're actually referring to. Where are the JBP vegan equivalents?

[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Hey don't get me wrong, there's a lot of people that need to touch grass, there's some areas that I have ignorant opinions about. But the best way to fix that is to have constructive mature conversations with real people.

Ps. Carnivore diet is silly and leaves you with less energy than 4 well rounded meals a day, even if it is consistent. Smaller complete meals throughout the day can give you more consistently high energy than ketosis ever will.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago
[-] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Is this meant to prove or disprove it?

There are some commercial vegan diets available which have synthetically made nutrients to replace those found only in animal based ingredients.

There may also be some that do not meet the safety and nutritional standards of other types of food. Manufacturers should provide information to show it is nutritionally complete and balanced. This information can be difficult to find and understand, so it's important to speak with your vet for advice too.

[-] fleetwheels@walledgarden.xyz 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Peter Singer isn't actually vegan (he is human garbage though), so idk why vegans still idolize him so much

(am vegan)

[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I hold no allegiance to Singer, I was merely using him as an example since he is a well known moral philosopher. But now I'm curious, what's the tea, why is he so bad? What makes him deserving of the title human garbage?

[-] fleetwheels@walledgarden.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

From a 2004 interview:

Concerning bestiality - should people have sex with animals, seen as willing participants? -- he responded, "I would ask, 'What's holding you back from a more fulfilling relationship?' (but) it's not wrong inherently in a moral sense."

Is there anything wrong with a society in which children are bred for spare parts on a massive scale? "No."

From a 2001 review:

But sex with animals does not always involve cruelty. Who has not been at a social occasion disturbed by the household dog gripping the legs of a visitor and vigorously rubbing its penis against them? The host usually discourages such activities, but not everyone objects to being used by his or her dog in this way, and occasionally mutually satisfying activities may develop.

Article on a 2015 case of a woman sexually assaulting her student, a mute man with cerebral palsy:

If we assume that he is profoundly cognitively impaired, we should concede that he cannot understand the normal significance of sexual relations between persons or the meaning and significance of sexual violation. These are, after all, difficult to articulate even for persons of normal cognitive capacity. In that case, he is incapable of giving or withholding informed consent to sexual relations; indeed, he may lack the concept of consent altogether.

This does not exclude the possibility that he was wronged by Stubblefield [the assaulter], but it makes it less clear what the nature of the wrong might be. It seems reasonable to assume that the experience was pleasurable to him; for even if he is cognitively impaired, he was capable of struggling to resist, and [...] it is implausible to suppose that Stubblefield forcibly subdued him. On the assumption that he is profoundly cognitively impaired, therefore, it seems that if Stubblefield wronged or harmed him, it must have been in a way that he is incapable of understanding and that affected his experience only pleasurably.

There's also this statement by the National Council on Disability in response to Singer's appearance on a radio show.

Singer's statements supporting eugenics, which is what he's most notorious for, are also not difficult to find.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
617 points (100.0% liked)

memes

10696 readers
2368 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS