803
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
803 points (100.0% liked)
Fediverse
33738 readers
607 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You're the one who wants this to be the only interaction between users.
I am addressing the points you chose, in the words you used. When you misrepresent what I said - that's not a "[your] logic and reasons" problem. You are lying to me, about me. I object.
And what I did with that objection was highlight your initial comment to try and connect that rationale with the reality of randos interacting on websites like this. You want accountability? Downvotes are it. Downvotes are a novel and effective means of shaping behavior. If you want to argue that just talking it out is better, don't act offended when someone disagrees with you in detail.
Every time someone insists downvotes should go away, I try to do what they want and just talk to them about how that's a bad idea, and they bruise like a summer peach from the slightest pushback.
'Downvotes are soft moderation.' 'But they don't stop bigots!' 'No, hence: soft. But you want even that soft consequence removed.' 'How dare you speak to me that way.'
I am what you are asking for. I am the kind of person who will tell you when you've lied about me, to my face, and steer the conversation back toward what we fucking wrote. You don't get to clutch pearls at that point. You are explicitly arguing against the bloodless option to downvote my tone and move on with your life. You wanted this. This is what it looks like, when someone engages with the things you said.
What you're doing is trolling. In the face of repeated sincere effort to address your posts, you respond with zero-effort dismissal.
Whilst demanding that all of Lemmy be reduced to a state where the only possible response to shite comments is other comments. What the fuck do you want, if not this?
No.
You want this to be the only way people can address bad posts. I am telling you, in detail, why that's a terrible idea. This is what you want! This is what you fucking asked for.
This is what you want for the entirety of Lemmy. If you're not keen on that, change your damn mind.
What you're doing is trolling, and you need to fucking stop.
I keep trying to address the goddamn argument. "I read what you said" is not that. You're supposed to read things... and then think about them... and say something about them. What you've done instead is get offended that someone was miffed at your misrepresentation, and then repeatedly say 'stop saying things!' with negative self-awareness.
Meanwhile.
The entire goddamn point is:
YOU WANT TALKING TO BE THE ONLY RESPONSE.
I am the one defending downvotes, as a feedback mechanism. You don't want them. You want the only possible interaction between users to be what I keep trying to do, with you, despite your repeated bewildering denial. This comment you are reading right now is what you fucking asked for. This is what you want. This is what feedback looks like. Do you understand that, or do you just want to spout your opinions into the void and act surprised when other people type stuff back at you?