785
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 year ago

Except even if they had regulations it would not have changed anything since she is a ciswoman

Imagine a corrupt state really wants gold. Why wouldn't they register a whole batch of males as female (or duplicate register as both sexes) wait 20 years then clean up the women's events?

[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

so, the heart of your argument itself is sexist. Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he's a man. Athletes at this level are insanely talented and fit. Some are even genetic anomalies, which explain why they can be so good at their sport. Simone biles is really small, which is why she's so good at flipping.

A female boxer at this level would decimate a male boxer who isn't genetically selected for and who hasn't trained his whole life to get to that level. Being male doesn't make one good at sports.

On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there's no money involved for the winner, requiring several hundred people to be the athletes who might be good enough to go to the event, boatloads of money to train them, and even then, they might get one through the event if the athlete isn't injured. All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he's a man.

No. Women should always have the option to compete against men, (and prove they are better), if they chose to. But just look at world records if you need concrete proof that males have an advantage.

Many sports there is no physical advantage and some (e.g. climbing) women have the advantage.

On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there's no money involved for the winner,

Not a single event, this could be done for multiple events, even without the athlete's knowledge. For the first decade only a few record keepers need to be in the conspiracy.

All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

Why? You should ask cold war Russia.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What exactly do you think the Soviet Union achieved by winning a bunch of medals?

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The person you are responding seems uninformed on the topic of Imane and in spreading misinform.

However, Russia does have a sordid history messing with international sports. Look up all the scandals in figure skating and also last year Olympics. I'm not sure why they do it. I think it has to do with projecting power on the world stage.

I'm steering clear of the topic of Imane.

[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No you aren't. You're arguing about trans women athletes competing in the Olympics against cis women in a thread specifically about Imane.

I'm arguing about the classification rules of the Olympic committee because the current rules are not sufficiently clear and have caused needless distress to at least two gold medal winners.

[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No, the rules are very clear. It's just right wing nutcases making up shit just to stir up trouble. The rules are there, and they've been in place long before this particular Olympic event.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"The gender and age of the athletes are based on their passport"

These definitions are not medically certified nor standardised across countries.

  • Propaganda and ideological superiority of communism.

  • Cold war rivalry. Proxy battle.

  • National pride and unity.

  • International prestige.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So nothing important then.

Yes, you've definitely come up with a plausible reason why a Muslim country would be okay with a transgender athlete. Algeria is just desperate for international prestige. It will definitely do something or other.

Yes, you've definitely come up with a plausible reason why a Muslim country would be okay with a transgender athlete.

Have I? Strange. I wasn't asked that question.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I love how your whole conversation here is like "I'm not saying Khelif isn't a woman and shouldn't compete, but someone who is a person who boxes women that I have not named, but have decided is not a woman, should not compete with women. But I'm not saying it's Khelif."

My point is to reduce future similar incidents. Not discuss any specific case. As it is, this discussion is doomed to be repeated.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

What do you think they would achieve in any practical way by winning a bunch of gold medals?

It's the Olympics, not trade negotiations.

It's estimated that the value of a gold medal is around $1 million in terms of economic impact, considering factors like increased tourism, sponsorship, and national pride.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Please do provide actual evidence for that claim. Specifically for a gold medal in women's boxing.

I found that statistic on Bing. You can too.

I'm not specifically discussing women's boxing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, you can find all kinds of fake statistics on Bing. That's how the internet works. Let's see the source of yours.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
785 points (100.0% liked)

World News

50488 readers
1605 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS