207
submitted 4 months ago by TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world to c/196

Tagged as NSFW because this level of nonsense is a cognito hazard. Found through a retweet of a Xitter post of a Reddit post of Facebook discussion. If shares this, please keep the repost count up to date. Ty! ๐Ÿ™

I've been wanting to create a community for this sort of "so wrong they're right" shit from right wingers. It wouldn't just be queer related, but about any instance of conservative logic accidentally pointing to the truth. It'd be stuff like this:

The only issue is that I dislike figuring simple tech stuff out, so I'll never get around to doing it. It's just a chore, even if it isn't hard or I know how to do it. I pick my fights with ADHD, and creating a community to run isn't a top priority ๐Ÿ˜ž

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] abbiistabbii 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ok so a trans woman transitions too well for their liking and thus they declare they must have been cis all along?

Fucking Kek.

[-] flying_wotsit 25 points 4 months ago

btw please write "trans woman" instead of "transwoman", I'm sure you didn't intend it but the latter is frequently used by as a dog-whistle by fascists to avoid admitting we are women.

[-] abbiistabbii 17 points 4 months ago

fixed, thanks for sharing.

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Thank you for sharing this as I wasn't aware of it

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Their criteria is based entirely on whether the person in question gives them a boner. Someone beat it to Mulvaney and now has to convince themselves that she is a "real woman" to sleep at night.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
207 points (100.0% liked)

196

16747 readers
1711 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS