620
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by NineteenDoornails@programming.dev to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

A lot of people dislike it for the privacy nightmare that it is and feel the threat of an EEE attack. This will also probably not be the last time that a big corporation will insert itself in the Fediverse.

However, people also say that it will help get ActivityPub and the Fediverse go more mainstream and say that corporations don't have that much influence on the Fediverse since people are in control of their own servers.

What a lot of posts have in common is that they want some kind of action to be taken, whether it'd be mass defederating from Threads, or accept them in some way that does not harm the Fediverse as much.

What actions can we take to deal with Threads?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ipodjockey@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Fuck em. Burn this place to the ground before we dance with the devil.

[-] bizzle@lemmy.moorefam.net 16 points 2 years ago

I have already blocked threads on my household instance. I decided that I don't want to have to trust major instance admins to take the same things seriously that I do.

[-] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I think defederation isn't the solution. Am I dumb in thinking this could actual have a mutual benefit?

Just an example: I will never use Threads, but if I can communicate with them from my Mastodon account, I would like to have that option.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] aranym@lemmy.name 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I run my own instance and am defederating immediately (whenever they start federating). I did also join the pact.
I'll evaluate their impact a month or so in and decide whether or not to refederate.

I acknowledge there's potential for a positive impact here, so I will give them a chance.

[-] Macallan@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Another vote to defederate here.

[-] guy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Given that everything right now is just speculation - I say sit tight, observe what actually happens and respond appropriately if it does start to go wrong. Defederation is very easy, we can do it when we need to

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Empyreus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Threads is exactly showing the biggest problem with anything Fediverse. It's simpler for the user so it will be accepted. The amount of people I've already seen join is huge compared to mastodon.

[-] marigo@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Lemmy doesn't need to be #1 in popularity. I'd prefer it to split and maintain a higher level of quality, even if it's smaller as a result. Even if Meta can grab data either way, it should be disconnected on principle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] irkli@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] emperorbenguin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

What an excellent article. Informative and to the point.

Recommend everyone read it.

[-] legion@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Lmao do people want ActivityPub to be relevant or not? Defederating yourselves from millions of users is idiotic.

I was looking forward to being able to use a mastodon to interact with people on Threads but apparently that's the worst thing ever for you guys? What?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] count0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago

"Should 'we' do?"

Nothing. If people and/or communities coming in through Threads are engaging in good faith, cool, more nice folks to have a community with. People/communities engaging in bad faith get blocked/defederated as is already common practice (and seems to be working outstandingly already, looking at average quality of posts and discourse "here" as compared to the "big platforms").

When Meta/Threads is hosting communities I like to see/be a part of, I'll figure out how to subscribe/integrate those. Besides that, they're free and welcome to run echo chambers in their own instances and communities, I don't see how any of that would ever show up on my feed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

threads will never federate.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago

I don't think we should defederate threads. It would only give Meta a walled garden which we will be outside of. Let them embrace us here and encourage everybody to scatter across instances so they can't defederate reasonably

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 9 points 2 years ago

It's worse off if we don't federate with them. That way they get their walled garden and people don't bother to use mastodon as it's incompatible. Federation gives everyone choices.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
620 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

29438 readers
965 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS