516
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

8GB RAM in M3 MacBook Pro Proves the Bottleneck in Real-World Tests::Apple's new MacBook Pro models are powered by cutting-edge M3 Apple silicon, but the base configuration 14-inch model starting at $1,599...

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kethal@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I don't have an Mac. How much RAM does it use just to turn it on? Windows 10 needs an astounding 4 GB just to see the desktop.

[-] BigT54@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

At least 4GB, my previous employer was a young guy that was an Apple simp. He bought a bunch of Mac minis as desktop computers and they only had 4GB of RAM. They were the most garbage piece of shit computer I have ever had the displeasure of being forced to use. It really wasn't even usable, it would lock up just trying to open any web browser or even the file explorer (or whatever Apple calls it). It really amazes me how Apple continues to shit in their customers mouths, tell them it's chocolate ice cream and they believe them

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Windows doesn't use it all to load the desktop. It caches the rest so the files and software you use often loads faster. There's also the reserved RAM for the hardware...

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Decipher0771@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

Ok but……who the hell runs blender and FFP in 8GB?

The vast majority of users are NOT running pro apps like that.

It’s just a name. If you’re actually running pro stuff, you’d be an idiot to run that on 8Gb no matter what machine.

Apple’s argument that it’s the same as 16gb is dumb, but anyone actually using pro apps on 8Gb is dumber. The majority of browser(with sane numbers of tabs)/iPhoto/office users really are probably not gonna notice.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Imagine buying a $1600 US laptop to use blender.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sviper@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

Well if that's the argument then they are also not gonna notice the M1 or M3 under the hood. Both chips are pretty good.

Heck even an older Intel chip should work fine in 2023 under those workloads.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Money is the bottleneck.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
516 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70140 readers
2465 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS