282

Hello just making a poll, which one do you prefer? personally I prefer x265 but since the rarbg falldown i've seen that almost all 1080p rips are in x264, what do you think about that, and do you recommend any place to find more x265 content beside those in the megathread?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

X265 all day long. Changed out most of my rips and gained terabytes of space back with no loss in quality.

It's amazing being able to hold an entire season of a show in the space that just a couple episodes at 264 would have used.

[-] DarkTides@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

x265 because I like the file size and am satisfied with the quality.

[-] itsAsin@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

i have always wondered the difference between the two encodings (beyond the obvious filesize). thanks!

i am also still lamenting the shutdown of RARBG. :(

[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago

Both allow for various degrees of parametrization between compression rate, quality, and performance. HEVC/H.265/x265 is just better at it - it allows for better compression at the same quality. Same for 10 bit. Same for AV1.

If you want maximum compatibility to players/playback you take 8 bit AVC/H.264/x264.

[-] Loki123@pathfinder.social 6 points 2 years ago

I have a personal Jellyfin server, and I usually reencode from x264 to AV1. Though if it's a matter of choosing a source, I always go for x264 for the least compression.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bongles@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

My opinion is based on Rarbg, that was the only time I paid attention. but x265 for sure.

[-] ordnehst@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

look for user "QxR" on 1337x. similar quality and size to rarbg x265. altough you might not find everything you are looking for

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

My old ass computers sadly can't handle h265 well so I tend to stick to h264. Moreover, my beamer cannot handle 4K or HDR so that makes more sense overall

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

I can't tell the difference

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Naratetama@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

x265 all the way, it uses less storage but can still look good.

I prefer AV1. The improvement of H.265 over H.264 is not uniform. It takes a lot of effort to get consistent results across content and content types.

[-] ThrowawayAfterDark@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 years ago

I just finished moving all my media to x265 and saved 7TB in the process. Quality looks plenty good to me but I always start from a remux if I can. Totally Worth it for the extra space.

[-] Suno@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

1080p x265, 720p x264

[-] jormaig@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

What happened to RARBG? I'm out of the loop

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloud 4 points 2 years ago

H264 then encode to h265 manually

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Potato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I prefer 265 for efficiency BUT there's a certain nostalgic warmth with 264 over-compressed fuzz. Same deal as with vinyl records. It was such an improvement on xvid back in the day....

[-] boopdepop@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've been using x265 exclusively for all my media needs, except on the rare occasions where only x264 was available.

[-] illyria817@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

x265 doesn't work for some hardware scenarios for me (e.g. files served up by UMS from my PC don't play properly on LG TV or using the standard media player on Roku). So I have to use x264 for anything that I won't be watching on a computer or via Stremio.

[-] suprjami@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

I prefer whatever codec my hardware supports. Currently Pi 4 does both your options so I don't care which. x265 has slightly smaller file size for the same quality wish is nice.

[-] fades@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Shit, I like HEVC in theory for the compression especially but it’s copyrighted bullshit or whatever.

I use Plex with lifetime pass on my QNAP NAS and it has to hardware transcode HEVC to a playable format because of said copyrighted bullshit.

It doesn’t affect me that much unless I’m trying to jump around on the media as it will need to load. The other thing is that you can have Plex save transcodes but that obviously gobbles up disk space.

tl;dr 264 = 👑

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
282 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55284 readers
455 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS