182
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard::It comes after the UK approved the $69bn takeover of Activision Blizzard, which makes Call of Duty.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago

What a shit time to be a gamer. Fuck Microsoft and fuck regulators for allowing this

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Activision already ruined blizzard and is/was a shit company. Anyone buying their games still is a sucker who loves being ripped off. Nothing of value was lost here.

[-] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

IDKY you're getting down votes. It's true. Nothing they've done for a while now is worth the time or money.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People still playing their games are mad I called them suckers probably.

[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

The regulators fought it in court. Blame the judge.

[-] grayman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So it's the judge biased or corrupt? Or maybe it's the garbage laws and politicians?

[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

From my reading, the judge was flawed.

[-] dm_me_your_feet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Activision waa such a piece of shit, I m actually very excited for this. They shitcanned Bobby too. It can only get better.

[-] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

This is getting closer and closer to a monopoly. It won't end well

[-] dm_me_your_feet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What monopoly? M$ revenue + Nintendo revenue = Sony Gaming revenue

If anything, playing field just got level, as M$ post merger will be about the same size Sony is.

Probably paid for with the money they made not paying $29B in taxes over the last 20 years.

We ain’t even playing the game with the same rules and they don’t even need to pretend anymore.

[-] Gregorech@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Well hlf of it was used for that the rest came out of the couch cushions at Mr Gates summer retreat.

[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I don't know, maybe I should be angry or something. But Activision/Blizzard have been pretty shitty for a while now. This will just be more of the same and more of me continueing to not buying their games.

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I grew up on Blizzard and Activision games, but the good feelings and nostalgia wore off when they started treating beloved franchises like DLC piggy banks.

[-] hazelnot 18 points 1 year ago
[-] zecg@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ActiBlizz haven't made anything I've been interested in for some time. MS got some amazingly shitty games out of Bethesda tho, Redfall and Starfield are just case studies in despising your audience.

[-] hazelnot 12 points 1 year ago

I'm not interested in their games either, my issue with it is that a lot of people are, and MS is trying their hardest to get a monopoly in the industry and/or turn everything into streaming-only subscription crap

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They’ve been dead. EA and Activision made sure of that long since.

[-] hazelnot 7 points 1 year ago

That's not what I meant and you're literally wrong lol, incredible games are made every year. My problem with this is that Microsoft is trying to turn gaming into its corporate cloud-only monopoly.

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Good games are still made, but the top shops, with respect to size and funding have priorities that aren’t aligned directly with enjoyment and story telling. There is a lot of requirement to be online, gambling addiction based mechanics, unfinished releases, MRR goals, and strong arm tactics by publishers for platform exclusivity. Perhaps I am literally wrong about my view, but it is my opinion nevertheless; wasn’t trying to start a debate.

User satisfaction is regularly an afterthought to profit, as is expected in capitalism but not always ideal for the consumer. And less competition doesn’t help.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Eh, I’m of the opinion when the old giants get stale or acquired into a grand corporate strategy new studios will spring up to fill the vacancy in the market.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Looking forward to see how this will improve the quality of Microsoft-Activision-Blizzard-EA-Ubisoft's games and those of the competito- oh, never mind. None left.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


After the competition watchdog blocked the takeover earlier this year, Microsoft's president Brad Smith hit out at the CMA's decision, which it said was "bad for Britain" and contradicted "the ambitions of the UK to become an attractive country to build technology businesses".

But the CMA's Ms Cardell said with the sale of Activision's cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft, which makes Assassin's Creed, "we've made sure Microsoft can't have a stranglehold over this important and rapidly developing market".

Under the restructured agreement, Microsoft has agreed to transfer the rights to stream Activision games from the cloud to Ubisoft for 15 years outside the European Economic Area (EEA).

The deal with Activision also means Microsoft will own its studio solely purposed for mobile games, with hopes of expanding on the successes of titles such as Candy Crush.

The takeover further cements Microsoft as a video game giant and could catapult it ahead of Nintendo to become the third-biggest player in the industry behind Sony, the owner of the PlayStation console, and market leader Tencent.

"[It will lead to] more choice, more innovation, better value and improved gaming experiences and a healthy, competitive market," said Ms Stewart, who is also a former head of ICT at the Cabinet Office government department.


The original article contains 932 words, the summary contains 209 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] ozmot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So let me make sure I’m reading this right. They let the deal go through because Microsoft gave Ubisoft the cloud streaming right to activation for the next 15 years. The argument being this deal will stop Microsoft from becoming a monopoly due to cloud gamings speculative importance in markets future.

Call me crazy but cloud gamings gonna take at least 15 years to be an important part of the market if it ever gets there in the first place. I can’t tell if regulators are stupid or wholly corrupt.

[-] Amir@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I'm missing the "haha funny number" comments from Reddit :(

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

haha funny number

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
182 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59407 readers
2472 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS