779
submitted 1 week ago by Maerman@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

So I just read Bill Gates' 1976 Open Letter To Hobbyists, in which he whines about not making more money from his software. You know, instead of being proud of making software that people wanted to use. And then the bastard went on and made proprietary licences for software the industry standard, holding back innovation and freedom for decades. What a douche canoe.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phase@lemmy.8th.world 48 points 1 week ago

He sold his first software before it was even finished to his own unuversity.

He saved Apple to avoid an antitrust trial.

It's just business right?

[-] bitcrafter@programming.dev 23 points 1 week ago

He sold his first software before it was even finished to his own unuversity.

What drives me crazy is when I hear this fact being cited as a positive thing that makes him a role model.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bagsy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

He didn't even write that software, he had to buy it from someone else because his own version sucked.

[-] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 week ago

And in retrospect it's too bad more people didn't steal from Microsoft so that it failed as a business.

[-] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Obviously Bill Gates is a household name and in the tech community everyone knows who is Steve Ballmer. However not many people know who Paul Allen is even though he was one of the founder of Microsoft at the very start. In 1982 Paul Allen was diagnosed with cancer and Bill and Steve were worried that if Paul died the shares of the company would go to someone else along with control of the company. While Paul was literally getting cancer treatment, Bill and Steve were scheming to dilute the shares of the company to wrestle the control of the company away from Paul. Fortunately for Paul he survived the cancer. It really doesn't put Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer in very good light though. I remember reading about this from Robert X. Cringely's blog about two decades ago and I heard Paul Allen wrote about his version of this story in his memoir before his death.

Edit: I tried to find the original Robert X. Cringely's story from back in 2006 but looks like that link is broken but he did referenced it in 2011 when Paul Allen's book was released.

https://www.cringely.com/2011/03/30/i-told-you-so/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago

The Hated One has a few videos about Gates and the shit he has done. Windows is only the tip.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

I really don't get how opinions on intellectual property and its "theft" turn 180 whenever AI is mentioned.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 week ago

ai is the rich stealing from us, piracy is usually us taking it from the rich.

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

AI is theft in the same way that all private property theft. It isnt the piracy of media, it's the alienation of labor from its product, and withholding it for profit.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago

"Well, Steve [Jobs]… I think it’s more like we both had this rich neighbour named Xerox and I broke into his house to steal the TV set and found out that you had already stolen it."

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There have been many times when I thought to myself: "Hold on. Can I be absolutely sure that billionaires are scum? Maybe there's a crucial part of the story I'm missing?"

Every single time I just found even more cases of them blatantly lying, manipulating data and taking advantage of everything and everyone around them for personal gain. And every one of those times, it got me more depressed about the current and future state of society and the world in general.

You can try this yourself. I highly recommend it, even though the outcome is obvious. We can very rarely, if ever, be 100% sure about anything, so it's always a good idea to put your beliefs to the test. However, I find it fairly self-evident that anyone seriously arguing in favor of any billionaire has simply never critically examined this topic.

No matter where and how deeply you look, it's just evidence upon evidence upon evidence that they are, in fact, the worst filth that has ever shared the air with us. Though at least this one thing is comming to an end. Soon, we'll be breathing toxic waste while they'll be enjoying clean air in their doomsday bunkers larger than entire neighborhoods.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

What?! No. I bet next you are gonna tell me lil Donnie Trump is a pedophile.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

Did you also read that he taught himself code by reading out print outs in the trash? He wanted to close that ability to learn. Shut that open stuff down and make licenses, while he himself learned from others.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 18 points 1 week ago

Didn't he come from a stupidly rich family and had access to a computer (at a time when it was like having access to a helicopter) whenever he wanted to learn and fiddle around? Isn't that where he got the print outs?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Not to say he's a good person, but contrary to most billionaires, he

  1. actually contributed some technical know-how in building his fortune (still, billionaires should not exist)
  2. did not rape children (as far as we know so far)

Furthermore, he's long gone from Microsoft, so I think your ire is better directed at Satya Nadella and similar totalitarian elitist pieces of shit

[-] fluxx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, not raping children is kind of a low bar. But didn't he lobby Astra Zeneca not to open source the covid vaccine, because he has a stake there? Humanist my ass. Edit: someone already pointed this out already, I ought to read the thread before posting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Melinda Gates divorced him because he was fucking around.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 32 points 1 week ago

She divorced him because it became clear he was a regular on Epstein's island.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's why one should not trust billionaires who make noises about changing the world for the better. It is merely to stoke their egos. I'm not even religious anymore but I still remember being taught that it is better to share the success without bragging about it. There are genuinely good rich folks, but they don't brag about how nice they are. Chuck Feeney, the billionaire founder of Duty Free, quietly donated the majority of his wealth by the time he died. He was left with $2 million after the donations and was renting an apartment in New York. There is also a millionaire who built houses for the homeless. But I would say that the "good ones" are far and few.

However, the darker side of trying to "be rich and be quiet about it" are some billionaires donating to regressive causes. I think I don't need to mention the Koch brothers and Murdochs. Being the "power behind the throne" is more effective way to actually wield power. That's why I don't think ridding Trump will solve anything unless there is a more robust system to prevent money in politics being put ever again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] comradegodzilla@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Billionaire being a selfish person? Who woulda known? But yes, even though he donates a lot of his wealth, becoming a billionaire is a sign of being a sociopath.

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago

His donations are a tax dodge. Besides this billionaire philanthropy is a way to say that the people should not dictate how funds are allocated to things like medical and scientific research, international aid, etc. it’s saying that we instead are okay with our wealth being extracted to pseudokings and allowing them to make these decisions on our behalf. Should we research aids? Space? Should we give food aid to foreign nations experiencing famine? We don’t get to decide, let’s hope one of the oligarchs shines their light on these plights.

Meanwhile it buys great PR to rehab an image. Bill gates is “the nice billionaire” who sends people 10k of Microsoft shit he didn’t even pay for through reddit secret Santa (eg an ad buy). No one then cares that was instrumental in making computers full of proprietary bullshit, destroying interoperability, eliminating competition and killing open source efforts (look up embrace, extend, extinguish if you want to get angry about 90s and early 2000s Microsoft), or even that he probably raped kids on epsteins island

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Geobloke@aussie.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Cool, you're taking life lessons from a 21 year old...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
779 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

42395 readers
671 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS