779
submitted 1 week ago by Maerman@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

So I just read Bill Gates' 1976 Open Letter To Hobbyists, in which he whines about not making more money from his software. You know, instead of being proud of making software that people wanted to use. And then the bastard went on and made proprietary licences for software the industry standard, holding back innovation and freedom for decades. What a douche canoe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago

My PC repair teacher hated Gates. The first story he told us about him was about how he essentially obtained DOS for a literal pittance, turned a massive profit on it, and never credited the original creators.

I might've skewed the story over the years of trying to keep it in my memory, but if I did it just goes to show how much I hate Bill Gates.

[-] nagaram@startrek.website 5 points 6 days ago

Nah you about got it.

[-] Iambus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

The most lemmy take ever

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

All billionaires are horrible humans and parasitic to all of humanity

[-] ronigami@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

He’s missing out on his redemption arc. But I doubt if put in his shoes that anyone would pass up the opportunity he had.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

yeah, but on the other hand, he fucked up the entire reduction system in the US.

[-] darkmogool@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

yeah… no shit…

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 256 points 1 week ago

AstraZenica COVID vaccine was going to be opensource but he used with weight as a donor to pressure the university to sell it to a firm he had ownership instead

[-] Maerman@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago

I read about that, yeah. All hail Mammon; money above all. Sometimes I think wealth changes something in a person's brain, like psychologically or neurologically. It's as if they get so detached from reality that they lose all empathy and sense of community. I've heard the term 'affluenza' used as a joke, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense as a legitimate thing.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 1 week ago

It takes a certain kind of personality to even become a billionaire. You don't become a billionaire by being kind and ethical

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 127 points 1 week ago

He's also a thief of course, as that's the only way to become a billionaire.

[-] Maerman@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago

Yup. He stole a bunch of ideas and code, then got upset that people were stealing his ideas and code. Do as I say, not as I do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ButtKiss@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 1 week ago

Well yes.

Being a Billionaire should be criminalized

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 96 points 1 week ago

Watch the TV movie from the late 90s "Pirates of Silicon Valley" which pretty much paints both Bill Gates and Steve Jobs as really shitty people. I mean just look at what Gates did with the Altair. Said he had an operating system, didn't have an operating system, and what have you.

Then there's the whole Xerox Park thing where neither Apple nor Microsoft would be where they're at today without the engineers at Xerox who were pretty much forced to hand over their stuff because Xerox execs didn't see value in a GUI and Mouse. Gates and Jobs both were more than happy to go in there and pillage what was developed in order to create Windows and The Macintosh/MacOS

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 week ago

We all know that every billionaire is a horrible person. They can't be anything else.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 week ago

There is a viable alternative to the problems raised by Bill Gates in his irate letter to computer hobbyists concerning "ripping off" software. When software is free, or so inexpensive that it's easier to pay for it than to duplicate it, then it won't be "stolen".

—Jim Warren, July 1976

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] melfie@lemy.lol 53 points 1 week ago

He’s still the same sociopath as always, except now with a savior complex. Giving away all his money, is he? His foundation has been around 25 years and he still has $100b+ net worth. A single individual shouldn’t have that much power, and the fact that he still voluntarily wields it while virtue signaling affirms every negative opinion of him. Even if he were the benevolent billionaire his PR campaign would have us believe he is, such a net worth should be reserved for governments where it’s spread across multiple agencies that have checks and balances and are accountable to voters. I don’t trust any individual with that much power, though I’d trust any random person off the street over anyone ruthless enough to become a billionaire.

[-] dil@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Idk who these ppl are even donating to, never benefits my life, wherever they go its not benefiting the ppl they took the money from, some third world country if that

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And for any of the people saying "he changed".

One of his most recent "philanthropic" ventures was to partner with Nestle (good start) to "modernize and increase yields" of the dairy industries in impoverished countries.

The two organizations then sold modern (likely non-servicable) equipment and entrenched them in corporate supply chain systems geared towards export and making it much harder to trade locally (not sure how that part worked, but was in what I read).

For a grand total of........ 1% increased dairy yields.

Then 3-4 years later they pulled out, leaving heavily indebted farmers without the corporate supply chains and delivery systems they were forced to switch to, and making it very difficult to switch back to the old ways of working, so they can't sell nearly as much locally.

Who do you think will buy up those farms when the farmers go bankrupt and have to sell ar rock bottom prices.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

His mother was an influential person on the board of directors of several firms. She met with John Opel, who was the IBM chairman, and secured her son's Microsoft contract with IBM in the 1980s, where it then became dominant and made her a ton of money.

It's vested interests, and who you know.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] phase@lemmy.8th.world 48 points 1 week ago

He sold his first software before it was even finished to his own unuversity.

He saved Apple to avoid an antitrust trial.

It's just business right?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
779 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

42395 readers
671 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS