602
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Intentionally breaking laws sounds like something that should be prosecuted.

[-] innermachine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It will always fall on the driver of the vehicle, as it should. I don't care how self driving your car is, it has a steering wheel, an accelerator pedal, and a brake pedal and in the driver seat YOU are responsible with how you operate your vehicle. If u decide to trust a self driving feature that's YOUR mistake. I would love to blame all these crashes on Tesla but the reality is that all these drivers aids and self driving cars having accidents is proof that you should be the one in control of your own vehicle. No crying about how the automotive nannies didn't stop you from crashing the vehicle your driving, take responsibility. Don't like it? Don't trust the "self driving" nonsense (read: glorified advanced cruise control). Now one thing I don't agree with is advertising as self driving, and I strongly believe self driving vehicles in public roadways should be ILLEGAL!

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Except the problem here is Tesla is lying about a product to encourage people to use it illegally and unsafely. At some point there's extra deaths to blame solely on tesla's lies.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Can you point to one of those lies? Because every time I push the FSD button it says 'keep hands on the wheel be prepared to take over at any time' right there on the screen.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Full Self Driving, the name of the feature is literally a lie. Its used all over in the marketing for the vehicle. Most car companies call comparable features "driving assistance" or "lane control" etc.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

There is a significant difference between lane control and FSD. Lane control just keeps you in the lane so you don't have to actively steer. FSD actually drives the car, changes lanes, makes turns, stops for traffic lights and stop signs, navigates intersections, etc. With the current v14, you can get in your car, type in a destination, and then not steer or push the pedals at all and the car will take you to a parking space at your destination. Lane control does not do that. I'm not aware of any other company that does that.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Tesla has the highest accident rate per driver for a reason. FSD has routinely plowed into children, emergency vehicles etc. Theres a number of lawsuits against them around the world.

Other companies have implemented these more limited systems (that often include better sensors such as lidar) not because they can't do it but rather because they are more cautious about brazenly lying to people about the capabilities of their system.

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 days ago

states just need to ban teslas from public road

[-] firewyre@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago

Why do we continue to allow this company to exist and break the law?

[-] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago
[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago
[-] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

By these powers combined...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

Adaptive cruise control is good enough for most people and has been a proven technology for 20+ years. FSD is just downright dangerous.

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I like my car’s version that’s just adaptive cruise control combined with using lidar maps of major roads to do lane-centering. I can go on a road trip and not touch the gas, break, or steering wheel for hours, but I have to drive it myself through residential neighborhoods.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Next will be teslas without airbags. Because why not.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

TBF, if they're going to lock you in a burning car unable to exit, killing you with the dashboard or sterring column would be a mercy killing compared to burning to death inside.

replace the airbag with a letal injection perhaps?

/s

[-] webdox@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

He's been real quiet lately. No more talks of release the list or the America Party. Did his K plug go on vacation?

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Now trump is black bagging US citizens in broad daylight, and Musk is an immigrant who fully admitted that he originally entered the country illegally. The danger must have creeped its way through his ketamine addled brain.

[-] architect@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 day ago

I can promise you he doesn’t even think about that.

He’s busy with his little Internet cult right now and I’m assuming some other malicious bullshit to fuck us with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kureta@lemmy.ml 62 points 2 days ago

They finally did it. They automated crime 👍

[-] MummysLittleBloodSlut 97 points 3 days ago

When a self driving car breaks the law, the CEO should get the demerit points on their own licence, and if they lose their licence, the cars can't drive anymore.

[-] thepompe@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago

Man, holding the company financially accountable for all traffic violations would be magnificent.

It's a shame we're too stupid/weak to pull it off.

[-] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 days ago

That would be funny but better yet, the entire line of cars gets the feature deleted from them and customers are reimbursed the entire value of the car plus interest in exchange for having risked their lives testing an unstable and dangerous vehicle.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Oh hell naw, I thought I bit the onion 💀

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 241 points 3 days ago

you, too, can die at the hands of AI and become forever enshrined as algorithmic data to help improve Tesla's subscription services sales to the very wealthy and hostile

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mhague@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Need jammers to confuse and break Teslas. They're weapons designed to break laws and protect occupants at the expense of bystanders. Can't be mad if a bystander redirects your Tesla into a ditch.

[-] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

protect occupants

It doesn't even do that. You crash a tesla and start a fire, it will glady lock you in the car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] etherphon@piefed.world 135 points 3 days ago

Since it seems to be unsafe at any speed, why not.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Mwa@thelemmy.club 10 points 2 days ago

the incompetence of this guy holy.

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 93 points 3 days ago

Just because Elon is above the law doesn’t mean you are, even if you’re in a Tesla. Good luck.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago

which comes with higher speeds and more frequent lane changes

Go kiss a concrete pillar, ya duds

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
602 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

76257 readers
2587 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS