734

Now I understand why at each windows 11 update, they introduce more bugs than ever

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

If this were true there would massive databreaches. AI is really bad at keeping private keys private. Not to even mention the default credentials it would use because it doesnt have commen sense to change them

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Likely a lot of manpower were focused on that, and/or the employees rather wrote their own code then lied about the AI use (heard a lot about it).

[-] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I disagree. It feels like your making this assumption from the point of view that people using AI to develop turn their whole brain off and let AI take the wheel. Any dev I know using AI uses it as a time saving measure, i.e. advanced autocomplete, or to assist with troubleshooting as a form of advanced search engine. Also you would have no need to give the AI the actual key itself, at most you would give it the title of the variable the key is saved as.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I find it hard to believe because I work at an adjacent company who has made similar claims and it is complete bullshit.

I do think there is some about of "AI provided a smart complete and the developer hit 'tab' to take the changes" equalling "this code was written by AI" in some metrics that go to the execs. And since the execs mandated high AI use everyone is fine just saying they have high AI use regardless of how true it is.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago

Honestly, I'm not surprised.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

They include tab complete of github copilot which is often as much as a single dot. Same thing they've done with all github copilot stats.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

Eww. Maybe it’s not really true and Microsoft just wants to remind us that big corporate AI is so legit that all the software you use all day was “helped” by it.

But really for me the issue is the company, not the AI. If I read an article about AI generated code making it into the Linux kernel or some gnu/kde/etc utilities, I don’t think I would worry much because those changes will be reviewed by cranky old nerds who care about the functionality of the software first. I have no such confidence in Microsoft’s processes.

[-] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 7 points 4 days ago

??? No it’s not! Can investors sue because this is such an obvious lie? Pls I have 0.3 Microsoft shares

[-] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 3 points 4 days ago

Are they including code generated to test their own models capability maybe?

[-] Mio@feddit.nu 4 points 4 days ago

And how many times was all that code rewritten?

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Sure as hell feels like it!

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I hope that that's inclusive of something like lines of documentation in comment lines.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
734 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69702 readers
2622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS