940

We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 19 points 15 hours ago

Why would anyone even used Plex since we have jellyfin?

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 8 points 13 hours ago
[-] d33pblu3g3n3@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Jellyfin subtitles now work flawlessly and you can finally select colors compatible with HDR.

Migrated to Jellyfin a few months ago and I haven't looked back.

[-] sudo@programming.dev 6 points 14 hours ago

It was there first and you can share it with friends more easily. For Plex you just register with the central server and share your username with your friends or w/e. Jellyfin has nothing like that.

[-] pory@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

And now, that feature costs $240. Suddenly, jumping through hoops to configure Jellyfin's external SSO plugin becomes a lot more rewarding.

[-] BackwardsUntoDawn@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

the PS4/PS5 app was one of my deciding factors when I used it

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 26 points 16 hours ago

I moved on to jellyfin after I found out the hard way Plex servers need to authenticate for use. I'm sure by now there are ways to set up offline authentication but I already didn't like the idea of paying monthly to stream my own content from my own machine. It just didn't make sence to me. Jellyfin isn't perfect, or as flashy as Plex, but it works, looks fine, and its free, not counting a much deserved donation to the devs .

[-] jeanofthedead@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago

Plex Media Server- Settings : Network : List of IP Addresses and Networks that are allowed with Auth : 192.168.4.0/24, e.g.

[-] zer0bitz@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 529 points 1 day ago
load more comments (79 replies)
[-] mcbang2000@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago

sometimes good software is worth paying for

[-] Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Yup, that's why people who can afford it should do ate to the jellyfin project

[-] Anivia@feddit.org 4 points 13 hours ago

Yes. I have a lifetime Plex pass, and I donated to Jellyfin as well. Looking forward to the day I can uninstall Plex and no longer worry about them potentially giving my data to Media companies so they can sue for piracy

[-] yallspark@lemmy.zip 16 points 18 hours ago

Big facts. Even the FOSS software, I buy the premium or donate a bit to it. It only feels right. I couldn't imagine making something millions of people count on and not throw them SOMETHING. Especially when its such a good experience.

[-] cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago

So basically.. this is a blatant cash grab, and a nearly 200% one depending on the level of service you pay/paid for. Wonder how long it will be before the lifetime pass is discontinued and everyone gets forcibly moved over to a monthly subscription model

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 73 points 22 hours ago

As a plex pass lifetime user, this doesn't change anything for me.

I am, however, blown away that the price went from $75 CDN to $350 CDN over the last 10 years!! That's just insane!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] profilelost@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 20 hours ago

I've been meaning to set up a homeserver with plex recently but will defnitely go for jellyfin now that I read this thread.

[-] rekabis@programming.dev 20 points 18 hours ago

I don’t like it, but it’s a pragmatic decision.

Hosting for a simple website can be as little as a few bucks a month. That’s easy for any project to absorb, even if they are open-source with no one pulling a paycheque.

Streaming requires high-performance, high-bandwidth machines that cost anywhere from several dozen dollars to several hundred dollars a month. You build a resilient high-availability network, and you could easily be looking at several tens of thousands of dollars a month.

That isn’t easy to absorb, even for a for-profit company with clearly-defined revenue streams.

Some people want everything for free, but free doesn’t pay the bills.

Full disclosure: I don’t use the streaming feature. I prefer to grab actual copies to drop onto my NAS. I also don’t share to friends and family, as I am the only one I know of who uses Plex.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago

Streaming requires high-performance, high-bandwidth machines that cost anywhere from several dozen dollars to several hundred dollars a month. You build a resilient high-availability network, and you could easily be looking at several tens of thousands of dollars a month.

Are you under the impression that Plex uploads the movie files to their servers and then transcodes them there, or something?

And the hard work happens on your own hardware. All Plex's servers are doing is acting as a signaling server, but no media or routed through Plex's servers.

[-] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago

Plex actually does have streaming services. The ones we've never asked for. And live tv.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

But the blog post from Plex was specifically talking about charging for remotely accessing your own files. So your point is irrelevant to the discussion.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

All those resources and costs are borne by the person hosting the video, NOT Plex.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 14 hours ago

they need none of that stuff. It's your own pc that handles the heavy stuff. From their end, the only point is to allow you to stream videos from behind one or more NATs

[-] PoorlySketchedIdiot@feddit.nl 4 points 13 hours ago

That high performance, high bandwidth streaming machine is in my house, not Plex's, though. I already pay for the maintenence, power and the bandwidth of that machine, not Plex.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 145 points 1 day ago

I'm not pirating a bunch of shows just to pay Plex for the privilege of watching it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 87 points 23 hours ago

If you don't like the price there's always jellyfin.

Got to say that I have been very happy with it.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 17 hours ago

Man, my Jellyfin subscription just rose in price too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dmtalon@infosec.pub 98 points 1 day ago

Glad I bought the Plex Pass like 13 years ago. While I understand everyone seems to think everything should be free, I'm sure your boss wishes you worked for free too, but the world doesn't work that way.

I'm OK supporting products I use , and Plex is an example of this for me. It was a well spend $75 in 2013

[-] LadyAutumn 57 points 1 day ago

Nah. Cool that you think that, though. The moment they started charging for what was a free service, they lost me. I have gigabit internet. The only reason i used their service to begin with was ease of use.

Hot take but maybe everything doesn't need to be an infinitely expanding business. Just imagine for a second that it's fine for something to just break even, pay for the few mainteners salaries and not expand the business at all ever. I know that I just uttered the cardinal evil under capitalism but fucking seriously. The primary userbase of plex is pirates. The whole incentive is not having to pay for a streaming service. Charging money for it is just torpedoing your entire userbase. The entire appeal of Plex was it not charging money.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] logos@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
load more comments (39 replies)
[-] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 146 points 1 day ago

As a result I imagine more users will look at other offerings such as Jellyfin.
https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin
https://jellyfin.org/

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago

I have a lifetime plex pass so this does not really affect me but I expect the trend of degrading experience to continue. I would have switched to Jellyfin a long time ago but I am dreading contacting everyone I share with and getting them migrated.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
940 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

44652 readers
1921 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS