727
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by Nighed@feddit.uk to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

They sell things that come in cups, or with napkins. Lots of people cycle/run/walk here instead of driving, seems pretty stupid.

Taking away the bins doesn't mean you don't produce rubbish....

Edit: I think there is still a bin IN the cafe, but most people eat/drink outside. Lots of people asking staff where the bins are. Still hypocritical I think though? (And still mildly infuriating to remove well used bins!)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Just throw it on the ground

  • the general public, probably
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 32 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

...huh? They want to cut down on litter by removing the convenient locations for people to dispose their would-be litter?

Fuck there are some incredibly fucking stupid people in charge of places right now...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HorseFD@lemmy.world 59 points 21 hours ago

This is the reason given in Australia by Parks Victoria

LEAVE NO TRACE

Advocate for minimal-impact practices wherever you go. Many people are surprised to find no bins in national parks. Waste attracts native animals, which can change their natural behaviour and harm both natural and cultural sites, as well as your personal belongings.

Always bring rubbish bags (and one for your neighbour) and take all your rubbish home. Help educate others about the importance of leaving the park pristine, minimising your impact on the delicate balance of the ecosystem.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

I feel like you want more trash cans not less. Make it easy for people to clean up after themselves

[-] Dultas@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

Have a fence, sign, benches seems pretty antithetical to LNT.

[-] Syun@retrolemmy.com 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, they threw LNT straight out the window and down the open manhole with flames shooting out of it with great delight. If you search for pics of the place, claiming "leave no trace" is beyond farcical.

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Different country, different styles I guess.

[-] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 161 points 1 day ago

I used to work for the Woodland Trust and believe that this is the right thing to do. Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow and attract unwanted pests like rats. Rats will also eat the eggs of ground nesting birds and cause other environmental issues.

If they are selling food on site then the food vendor should have a bin that their customers can use inside their cabin/cafe and dispose of the waste daily as part of the service.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago

Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow

Think I found the problem— why not do the obvious thing and empty them more often?

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

If people weren’t such babies and cleaned up after themselves, we wouldn’t need to waste taxpayers money on cleaning up after adults who could do it themselves.

[-] FundMECFSResearch 36 points 1 day ago

I dunno about you, but if I see a bin in a public area, I assume some is paid to empty it. I don’t empty it myself.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you took your own garbage with you like a decent human, there would be no bins to be emptied and you would have better uses for that tax money.

Where did I imply the public should be doing it….?

[-] FundMECFSResearch 27 points 23 hours ago

So your entire argument is public bins are useless?

You understand that people should clean up after themselves whether or not there is a bin, but offering a bin is a useful service that greatly helps people out can be compatible right.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

Sounds like there's a bunch of people and some kind of organisation that runs this area, after all, they made the decision to take the bins away. This is also a cafe area, so someone's making money off this zone.

THOSE PEOPLE ARE.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago

Genuine answer here, as someone who volunteers for the parks. A lot of times the budgets are tight, depending on whose responsibility it is to clean up the area and what services are there/nearby, the staffing just isn't available. Yeah it's a pretty easy thing to do in theory, but in practice when it becomes "okay and 2 hours of your shift is driving out there and emptying the cans" it's not a far leap to just "Remove the cans, make the snack stand dispose of their garbage on their own"

I mean I get it, the cans are nice but also, like you're an adult. Throw your trash away on your own.

"But then people will throw it on the ground!" Okay then pay someone to stand out there and slap every idiot that thinks littering is okay because they couldn't find a can in 10 seconds.

It's common decency in plenty of places around the world to take your garbage with you until you find a can. It's not hard.

[-] mmddmm@lemm.ee 6 points 13 hours ago

That's literally the patio of a commercial place that sells food enclosed in trash.

If they rely on volunteers to clean the trash, a lot of people are doing lots of things very wrong.

[-] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Because that would mean employing someone to empty them regularly, and as most woodland is few and far between in this country most woodland owners deem that an unnecessary expense.

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 14 points 22 hours ago

There’s a cafe and forestry workers, is it that time consuming?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is right by the cafe/site office/car park though. The reception desk is about 20m to the left and staffed during daylight hours year round.

Not like it's in the middle of nowhere.

I get your point, there are very few bins elsewhere (mostly by the other car parks) and that's fine. It's just that the place that gives you rubbish makes it hard to responsibly get rid of it.

[-] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It's not like paper and plastic wrappers are heavy or bulky. Just hold onto it or put it your pocket until you get home or find a bin elsewhere.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] criitz@reddthat.com 39 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I'd give this some odds of reducing trash pollution. It can seem frustrating, but it MAY change people's behavior in a way that reduces litter. Behavioral economics can be counterintuitive.

EDIT: What matters is the result. If this makes more people litter, they should probably bring back the bins. If this reduces litter, they should keep it this way, regardless of how inconvenient or "stupid" you the reader find it.

[-] bali10050@lemmy.world 47 points 22 hours ago

No. Most people just start littering when there's no trash bins nearby.

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 19 points 22 hours ago

Think of the stupidest person you know, etc etc.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

Hardly an issue of stupidity. We've got shops a short ride away that sell you disposables with the intent of bringing them into the park. And we've got a park that's removed the bins used to cart the waste back out again.

The stupidity is in the policy. Either you have to prevent people from bringing this stuff in (incredibly difficult) or you have to manage the waste that exists by centralizing its collection and export (significantly easier and cheaper).

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 6 points 19 hours ago

People that litter are atupid/lazy/poorly educated.

Unfortunately, if you don’t provide bins, some people are going to litter. Does my head in.

[-] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 6 points 18 hours ago

Selling food that comes with garbage included, in a location without bins, is littering.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago

They're shit people. I take cans home to recycle because we don't have proper recycling at my workplace.

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 28 points 22 hours ago

If you operate a business that sells things in paper plates and wrappers, you certainly have a moral responsibility to have waste receptacles to collect those waste products.

The problem isn't that a park lacks trash cans. The problem is that a cafe removed their trash bins.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 91 points 1 day ago

Gentrified forest is the most cursed phrase I heard in a minute.

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago

I think it's a pretty good description. Has a tarmac car park, cafe, bike hire, 3 go ape routes, wheelchair accessible routes and until recently, bins!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fuamerikkka@lemm.ee 13 points 19 hours ago

Think it's a mentality as well.

Had a friend in high school and after the drive in we went to, I cleaned up my trash and threw it away. My friend said "why are you doing that, they pay people to do that" and proceeded to leave her trash.

Didn't stay friends, but who the f thinks that way?

Entitled Amerikkkans.... that's who.

Pick up your own trash.

Not other people's trash.

YOUR OWN.

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago

I will absolutely pick up other peoples trash if it’s somewhere like the wilderness. They should have picked it up themselves but I’m there now and that trash shouldn’t be there.

[-] fuamerikkka@lemm.ee 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Me too....I bring bags with me and clean up places I hike / fish / camp....I try to leave places better than when I found it and it absolutely irks me when people can't be bothered to throw their own trash away.

I guess it wasn't clear that I think it's ridiculous that people can't even pick up their own trash.

[-] Contemporarium@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago

When I was visiting England I remember my grandpa and I walking around London looking for a trash can and being shocked at how rare they were compared to the US

[-] fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

One reason that the UK has few trash cans is because of the IRA, a ~~terrorist organization~~[edit: paramilitary organization] that would plant bombs in them. It is kind of a sore point when Americans notice stuff like this, because US citizens were significant donors to the IRA.

N.B. There isn't a reason why you should know this.

source: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1cxsvp/how_prevalent_was_american_funding_of_the_irish/

[-] lost_tortie@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

please clean up after yourself.

[-] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 33 points 1 day ago

Weird, when Japan does it everyone praises them. I guess us western societies are just too trashy to clean up after ourselves.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] ericthemighty@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

It mildly infuriates me that you can't see the logic in taking your rubbish with you when you leave.

[-] alphapuggle@programming.dev 40 points 1 day ago

While this is the ideal outcome, in reality people are just going to throw their trash in the bushes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Saying they are committed to producing no rubbish on site on a sign, then selling things that result in rubbish, is hypocritical.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Looks like the bean-counters thought they could easily axe the trash cost by shoving onto everyone else. I doubt it will increase the natural beauty there.

[-] liv@lemmy.nz 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This has been happening in New Zealand for a while. The theory seems to be that bins attract more litter and are a hazard to wildlife.

I was sceptical at first but it actually seems to work.

Perturbs me that they are selling food though. Surely yhe food sellers should have bins for which they are responsible in their immediate vicinity.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

How do trash cans attract more litter?

[-] liv@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 hours ago

I don't know. I haven't seen the research.

I was alarmed by it at first but it's been a few years now and the parks where I go which used to have them don't seem any more littered fwiw. If anything less so.

But that's anecdotal and as I understand it the decision was made based on more than that.

[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 10 points 22 hours ago

It's like my university campus removing all ashtrays to stop people from smoking.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

In the US they could just restrict smoking areas

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
727 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

38279 readers
1851 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS