64
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Today@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

How long before the savings are negative?

[-] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 18 points 4 months ago

I think we're already losing.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's like stopping maintenance on your house and then boldly claiming you've saved so much money. Yeah sure, right up till the point you go bankrupt from medical bills due to all the mold you've been exposed to.

If this isn't the darkest time line, it for sure must be the dumbest.

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

But Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 4 points 4 months ago

Water? Like from a toilet?

[-] notsure@fedia.io 9 points 4 months ago

It's almost if, now come along with me, putting someone who has no idea how governing works is put in charge of funding for such governing is a bad idea? no more snark left

[-] Shawdow194@fedia.io 5 points 4 months ago

This doesn't seem very efficient at all. Very unproductive and probably less than 5 bullet points of work

It seems it would be better off removing this department - in the name of being efficient and all

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1080 readers
29 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS