64
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Today@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

How long before the savings are negative?

[-] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 18 points 5 days ago

I think we're already losing.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's like stopping maintenance on your house and then boldly claiming you've saved so much money. Yeah sure, right up till the point you go bankrupt from medical bills due to all the mold you've been exposed to.

If this isn't the darkest time line, it for sure must be the dumbest.

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

But Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

Water? Like from a toilet?

[-] notsure@fedia.io 9 points 5 days ago

It's almost if, now come along with me, putting someone who has no idea how governing works is put in charge of funding for such governing is a bad idea? no more snark left

[-] Shawdow194@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago

This doesn't seem very efficient at all. Very unproductive and probably less than 5 bullet points of work

It seems it would be better off removing this department - in the name of being efficient and all

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

709 readers
181 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS