628

And they're already kissing Trump's ass

(page 4) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] arseneau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This whole thing just comes across as craven and politically motivated by the US government. If they were really concerned with apps (whether or not they're owned by the Chinese government) collecting and selling user data, they would pass adequate and enforceable privacy laws. Banning one specific app is addressing a symptom rather than a root cause, and any solution to an issue like this ought to apply to the entire field more broadly. I don't necessarily think that banning TikTok is a bad thing, but to do so in such an obviously politically motivated way belies a lack of concern about the underlying issue (i.e. the mass harvesting of user data) in my opinion.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Not to doubt that it's politically motivated, but the ban law as written could be applied to any app with a country of origin on the US "Foreign Adversary" list AND declared to be a national security issue

[-] firepenny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Good, can't be happier for this!

[-] ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You love it when the government censors people because it can? What are you even on?

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Real talk, does Trump have the actual authority to save the app?

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sigh. H. R. 7521 stipulates that the POTUS must make the determination using data supplied from several federal agencies etc that an app or service violates the terms laid out in the law. Then a formal investigation will be launched by the AG's office and if that investigation finds that the app or service is in violation of the law that app or service will be added to a list of apps or services not allowed to be disseminated to the public via American based app stores. That app or service does have the right to appeal the decision within a specific time frame and appeals will be handled by the appropriate district court. At that point if they win the appeal they continue to operate. If they lose the appeal they can do what is called a qualified divestiture so that they would no longer be operating in conflict with the law. Or they can do what Tik Tok did and remove access without the law even being enforced.

So, yes, Trump can just not name Tik Tok as in violation of the law, the AG won't investigate it, and nothing will come of it.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521/text

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I’ve never used it. I was only exposed to second hand smoke.

It’s strange for me to avoid a platform like this. Back in the early days I would sign up for anything.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
628 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60605 readers
2790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS