207
submitted 2 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 130 points 2 weeks ago

“Joe Biden’s decision is a clear gross abuse of power. He, and his supporters, have blood on their hands.”

By not killing people? Are they actually insane? I’m guessing just disingenuous bc the whole framing they’re doing glosses over the fact that these convicts are still going to do life without parole.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. The reason most of them are on death row is it takes literally decades of litigation before someone can be put to death (a good thing). By commuting their sentences Biden is saving the taxpayers millions.

[-] FundMECFSResearch 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thank god. I was scared they’d try to get luigi killed during Trump’s term as a sort of example.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

What makes you think that this action by Biden has any effect on that?

[-] FundMECFSResearch 1 points 2 weeks ago

I never said I did. This was relating to the Trump admin.

Not insane, just dishonest assholes.

[-] Bezier@suppo.fi 7 points 2 weeks ago

I say both. Those things aren't mutually exclusive.

I don’t know. Insane implies they’re not responsible for their actions because they don’t know any better.

That isn’t the case these grifters are fully aware of what they’re doing and they don’t care.

[-] Bezier@suppo.fi 1 points 2 weeks ago

He does seem to be losing grasp of reality, in addition to being a grifter. But I can't be making any real judgement about this either.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

I guess if you follow the logic that the death penalty is the only deterrent that works, as opposed to just life on prison, Biden just told people that they can crime all they want, you won't get the death penalty.

This is obviously bullshit, but that's the thinking behind the statement.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I've been hearing quite a bit pro-murder sentiment coming from the left lately so I'm not sure what the issue here is.

EDIT: No amount of mental gymnastics changes the fact that Luigi is a murderer and if you think the CEO deserved to die for being "murderer" himself then so does Luigi.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 weeks ago

The vast majority of people celebrating the death of the United Healthcare CEO would have been perfectly happy with him being stripped of power and imprisoned, but that wasn't ever an option so the only thing available is death. There's also some evidence that his death has actually made a difference, in the form of other health insurance companies chickening out of unethical policy changes.

In the case of these prisoners, they're already safely behind bars. It's also, broadly speaking, much more likely that they aren't guilty of what they've been convicted of (although I don't know anything about these particular cases). We also have evidence that the death penalty doesn't have the effect on crime rates which proponents claim it does, so it's different in a whole bunch of ways

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

One is either for death penalty or against it. Being for it in the case of CEO's but against it when it comes to convicted criminals is called hypocrisy.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

Every single step that Luigi took, right before shooting the ceo, was legal. Everything the CEO and his company did to their customers is legal.

I'm all for changing the legal system in any way that would make it harder for unwell people to get guns or insurance CEOs to stop murdering and maming their subscribers through denials. We don't have the political will to change any of that so excusing me for not shedding tears over this CEO's death.

There was a literal mass shooting at a school the same day. I feel way worse for those kids.

Being against the death penalty and bemused at conservative political consequences is not hypocrisy. Maybe stop being angry at "the left" for not shedding tears and instead propose any change that would have prevented this.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

They don't know anything about "the left" any more than they know what hypocrisy is.

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

You're not representing my view honestly.

I'm not criticising the left for "not shedding a tear." I'm criticising them for celebrating a murderer.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I disagree. It's perfectly possible to hold an internally consistent view that it's wrong to execute a prisoner, both because there's no reason to do so (the prisoner already being imprisoned) and because courts get the decision wrong too often (and/or because the courts aren't trustworthy), while also believing that it's acceptable to kill under other circumstances

[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sure, it's acceptable to kill when you're defending yourself or your country but shooting a man on the street is a whole different case and who ever celebrates this kind of vigilante murder has no moral ground to stand on from which to criticise the death penalty.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

That man on the street and his like have murdered plenty of people and will continue to do so until they are stopped. It has fuck-all to do with state executions.

The class war is literally war, and only one side has been taking all the casualties. It's about time people fight back. The moment we can lock these people up for their crimes against humanity I will be against killing them.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 16 points 2 weeks ago

There is a stark difference between killing a mass murderer when there is no legal recourse and allowing the state to execute a prisoner who could just as easily be kept imprisoned for life.

[-] Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

If hypocrisy is what it takes to keep literal evil the fuck outta here. Small price to pay

[-] nyctre@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"free opinions"... I guess you get what you pay for..

Anyway, it's not hypocrisy because you're comparing apples to ai generated articles. He was the CEO of a company responsible for denying billions of dollars worth of life saving medicine. Comparing that to one murder is silly. Saying they both deserve the same punishment is silly.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

You are confusing hypocrisy and nuance.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Luigi didn't murder anyone. Luigi committed an act of self defense/ community defense against a mass murderer.

Those that make peaceful progress impossible, also make violent resistance inevitable.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Doesn't seem to me like the support is coming only from the left.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 29 points 2 weeks ago

You can tell the journalist wrote "rages at" in the headline because we'd rip the pish out of them if they said "SLAMS"

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

“President-elect Trump ELECTRONICALLY PONTIFICATES at Biden over pardons for death row inmates.”

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, at least they took 3 seconds to try and be vaguely original.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

If the headline doesn't at least contain an "eviscerates" or "skullfucks" I won't even bother to read it.

[-] phughes@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago

Biden left the three people Trump wanted to pardon on the list so he could be the good guy for all the Nazis out there. It’s a Christmas gift in the spirit of bipartisanship

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I'm guessing trump will avoid executing Dylann Roof cuz.. ya know. But perhaps he will kill the 31 year old Boston bomber cuz he is a Muslim immigrant.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

Ha ha ha. It is a very merry Christmas.

[-] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's all he wanted for Christmas, nothing like executions to make a dictator smile.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump Rages at Biden for Wrecking His Plans for Executions: ‘Makes No Sense’

President-elect Donald Trump reacted to President Joe Biden’s commutation of the sentences of 37 of the 40 people on federal death row with befuddlement and disbelief on Tuesday, claiming the decision “makes no sense.”

“Joe Biden just commuted the Death Sentence on 37 of the worst killers in our Country,” Trump wrote, in a Christmas Eve post on Truth Social, featuring his usual irregular capitalization.

“When you hear the acts of each, you won’t believe that he did this. Makes no sense. Relatives and friends are further devastated. They can’t believe this is happening.”

On Monday, the White House announced Biden had commuted the sentences of 37 men on federal death row to life without parole. Biden left three federal inmates to face execution: racist mass murder Dylann Roof, antisemitic mass murderer Robert Bowers and Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

The decision was explicitly designed to stifle the death-penalty-loving Trump—who oversaw a modern record 13 federal executions during his first term—before he returns to office.

“In good conscience, I cannot stand back and let a new administration resume executions that I halted,” said Biden, in a statement announcing his decision.

On Tuesday, Trump followed up his original post with a promise to pursue capital punishment once he’s back in power.”

“As soon as I am inaugurated, I will direct the Justice Department to vigorously pursue the death penalty to protect American families and children from violent rapists, murderers, and monsters,” Trump wrote. “We will be a Nation of Law and Order again!”

Trump’s return to office had already raised concern among human rights experts.

“It is near certain that Donald Trump will re-start the federal killing machine where he left off, and we remain concerned about the human rights of those who are still on federal and military death row,” said Paul O’Brien, Amnesty International USA’s Executive Director, in a statement.

Trump’s spokesperson Steven Cheung was even more effusive about Biden’s clemency than his boss, saying Monday that the death row inmates whose sentences were commuted are “are among the worst killers in the world,” excoriating Biden’s “abhorrent decision” as “a slap in the face to the victims, their families, and their loved ones.”

Responses from victims’ families and loved ones, however, has not been unanimous.

Heather Turner—whose mother was killed during a 2017 bank robbery in South Carolina by one of the men whose death sentences was commuted—slammed the decision, writing on Facebook: “Joe Biden’s decision is a clear gross abuse of power. He, and his supporters, have blood on their hands.”

But retired Ohio police officer Donnie Oliverio, whose partner was killed by another man whose sentence was commuted, offered a statement of support: “Putting to death the person who killed my police partner and best friend would have brought me no peace. The president has done what is right here, and what is consistent with the faith he and I share.”

Biden emphasized, in announcing his decision, that he condemns the murderers and grieves for those who suffered losses.

“But guided by my conscience and my experience as a public defender, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, vice-president, and now president, I am more convinced than ever that we must stop the use of the death penalty at the federal level,” he said.

His act was hailed by human rights experts.

“The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment, and President Biden’s eleventh-hour decision before leaving office to commute these death sentences is a big moment for human rights,” said Amnesty’s O’Brien.

Tanya Greene, US program director at Human Rights Watch, said the “courageous decision recognizes the U.S. death penalty has failed to deter crime or improve public safety, risked the execution of innocent people, and runs counter to the belief in the dignity of all human life and the possibility of redemption.”

Biden’s historic commutation came little more than a week after the president granted some 1,500 pardons and commutations to Americans convicted of nonviolent crimes in the largest single-day act of clemency in modern U.S. history. It also followed his controversial pardon of his own son.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[-] recentSloth43@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

In defense of trump, it's what white jesus wants

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
207 points (100.0% liked)

News

23786 readers
2860 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS