1209
AI's take on XML (lemmy.world)
(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Balisage Paper: Fat Markup: Trimming the Fat Markup Myth one calorie at a time

https://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol10/html/Lee01/BalisageVol10-Lee01.html

XML is a fine format in comparison to JSON.

[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I hate writing and reading xml compared to json, I don't really care if one is slightly leaner than the other. If your concern is the size or speed you should probably be rethinking how you serialize the data anyway (orotobuff/DB)

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean we have a generation that thinks XML is bloated & JSON is superior but those two formats are about the same on performance & compressed size--which was the point. The non-plaintext-readable formats are superior along a lot of metrics but harder to debug & ultimately less common.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

XML has its strengths as a markdown format. My own formatted text format ETML is based on XML, as I could recycle old HTML conventions (still has stylesheet as an option), and I can store multiple text blocks in an XML file. It's not something my main choice of human readable format SDL excels at, which itself has its own issues (I'm writing my own extensions/refinements for it by the name XDL, with hexadecimal numbers, ISO dates, etc.).

[-] Fontasia@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

OH HEY EVERYONE, EVERYONE, THIS GUY LIKES JSON

Fuck you and your unstructured garbage.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1209 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32445 readers
914 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS