988
submitted 9 months ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 253 points 9 months ago

Putting out arrest warrants on both of them is so smart. It's a way to avoid people claiming they are taking sides or playing favorites or aiding terrorists or being in favor of genocide or whatever. Both leaders are culpable because both the IDF and Hamas have committed atrocities.

[-] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 190 points 9 months ago

It is a politically savvy and ethically correct move. Really nice when those line up.

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

There's something satisfying about it.

[-] Gamers_Mate@kbin.run 46 points 9 months ago

At least the ICC is willing to do the right thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Putting out arrest warrants on both of them is so smart. It’s a way to avoid people claiming they are taking sides or playing favorites or aiding terrorists or being in favor of genocide or whatever.

It would be absurd and unjust to issue a warrant for only one of them. This was the right thing to do.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I agree, and I found it interesting that Israeli leaders were not accused of genocide or anything to do with their bombing campaign. Instead, it was the specific war crime of causing starvation due to their interference with humanitarian aid and food delivery. Kind of provides additional context for the US decision to build a floating pier off the Gaza coast.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

It's much easier to say that an intentional blockade of food is leading to starvation, and that is a clear war crime. Very simple argument, easier to prove.

Talking about a bombing campaign is more difficult when soldiers are mixed in with the civilians. We may be able to point at the situation and say "that's clearly fucked up", but courts don't work that way. They have to acknowledge that in a war, the army is allowed to destroy the combatants of the enemy. A certain amount of collateral damage in the form of innocent lives lost is allowed by international law. This makes it all much murkier and more difficult to prove what is or is not a genuine war crime. They can't wing it, or guess, or go by what it "looks like", they have to prove it, which again, is difficult.

Starvation and depriving food aid though, very easy to prove.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] manucode@infosec.pub 195 points 9 months ago

The CNN headline is a bit misleading. It's not the International Criminal Court as a whole that is seeking these arrest warrants but the ICC's chief prosecutor Karim Khan. The judges have yet to decide on these warrants.

[Side note: This is the same kind of lazy journalism that uses terms like EU chief or EU leader interchangeably for the President of the European Commission (Ursula von der Leyen) and the President of the European Council (Charles Michel). If this was limited to a short headline, I could excuse it, but CNN continues with the same wording in the first sentence of the article: "The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for ..." which is absolutely unnecessary, even if CNN clarifies things later.]

[-] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 73 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I've always considered CNN to stand for Clearly Not News

Edit - the BBC headline starts "ICC prosecutor seeks arrest of..."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ggpe3qj6wo

[-] solo@slrpnk.net 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ok, this is very interesting. How is it he took this initiative? Actually, is it an initiative or part of the process?

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 40 points 9 months ago

It's part of the process. Now the request is before judges who will decide whether or not to issue the arrest warrants. For reference, when an ICC prosecutor asked for an arrest warrant for Vladmir Putin, it took a couple months for the judges to decide and then issue the warrant.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago

Biden can't save him, because we wouldn't agree to the Rome act because we thought that somehow meant we couldn't be charged at the Hauge for our war crimes. That's not true tho, we don't have to agree to it.

Israel and the United States are not members of the ICC. However, the ICC claims to have jurisdiction over Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank after Palestinian leaders formally agreed to be bound by the court’s founding principles in 2015.

[-] nahuse@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago

I mean… yes you do, since that’s a little bit how international law works? Countries who do not sign and ratify the Rome statute and then remain in there aren’t governed by the ICC in the same way.

You will see in the excerpt you quoted, the reason the ICC believes it has jurisdiction is because of events taking place in Palestine, which has taken part in the Rome Statute previously.

And the United States has a law that says it will militarily invade The Hague if any US service member is arrested and held by the court. It came about along with all the other legislative bullshit in the years after 9/11/01. The US had previously been a founding member of the ICC, but withdrew for reasons of sovereignty.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Sovereignity, my ass. They just don't want war crimes committed by their own military investigated by an independent body.

[-] nahuse@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

Correct.

That position and sovereignty are not mutually opposed, depending on the view you take towards international law.

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Hittem with that "sovereignty to do what?"

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

By your logic the nazis shouldn't have been tried at the Hauge...

Is that what youre intentionally saying? Or did you not think it through?

Like even this bit:

And the United States has a law that says it will militarily invade The Hague if any US service member is arrested and held by the court. It came about along with all the other legislative bullshit in the years after 9/11/01. The US had previously been a founding member of the ICC, but withdrew for reasons of sovereignty.

If no US service member could be tried at the Hauge because the US didn't sign the Rome agreement...

Why pass a law saying we're not subject to it?

And when did Bibi join the US military anyways?

I missed that one...

[-] nahuse@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

First: it’s not my logic. It’s how this part of international law works. The International Criminal Court wasn’t created until 1998, and the statute that governs it only officially came into power in 2002. Not all countries have signed, and some (including the US) have withdrawn from it. This means that technically the ICC doesn’t have any jurisdiction over things that happen within its territory.

The US codified it into a domestic law because it doesn’t believe its should be beholden to any law higher than its domestic ones, and the United States often does shady things in countries where the ICC does have jurisdiction, making it a risk that US citizens (and leaders) can be arrested for crimes that occur there. So the US Congress wrote domestic policy stating that it reserved the right to invade if its citizens were held for trial.

And Bibi didn’t join the US military. But the US has shown it’s willing to support his administration through an awful lot of shit, and the US doesn’t have any ambiguity about how it regards the ICC.

Finally, are you referring to the Nuremberg trials? Nazis weren’t tried in The Hague court we are discussing, and I’m not sure any nazi trials happened there at all.

Edit: I don’t understand the downvotes. This is literally just how the International Criminal Court works.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago

Nice that they see the criminals on both sides.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

Same side.

Hamas is almost totally funded by Benny and his croneys.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago

Wow, whitewashing Iran and Qatar's role in Hamas' actions. Very progressive left of you.

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Boo hoo, did the homegrown terrorist org funded by state interest as a propaganda machine get outta hand?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Deway@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Was I think, they stopped a few years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Good, this is a situation in which both sides are both truly disgusting and vile, using people as pawns, shields, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] solo@slrpnk.net 47 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure I understand how these warrants can take place. It will come from other member states in case any of them travel there?

Also how is it that Putin has not been arrested yet? Has he avoided those destinations.

If I misunderstood something or everything, please let me know.

[-] anlumo@lemmy.world 92 points 9 months ago

Yes, Putin has avoided those destinations so far. He even got warned by South Africa that they’d have to arrest him if he were to travel to a meeting there.

[-] solo@slrpnk.net 19 points 9 months ago

Thank you for the clarification!

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago

They can't make a country arrest it's own leader.

But if they travel to any UN country, the country is supposed to arrest them, or coordinate with countries willing to.

So these are more like an exile than anything.

Kind of like a sanction but instead of money it's on personal travel.

Sanctions are still waaaaaay more effective though and what we should be doing. Money is what these despots care about.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 9 months ago

so this also means that if netanyahu loses elections, he can be just sent to hague

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

If the person who beats him wants too...

And if Netenyahu even lets Israel have elections. Before 10/7 he was already in the process of getting kicked out of office, the only reason he's still in power is 10/7.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 37 points 9 months ago

Regardless of the technicalities and nuances in the reporting: this is a good thing.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 37 points 9 months ago

Can we talk about a story that's fallen through the cracks here? CNN claiming this as an exclusive is madness. Who do these people think they are? And should the ICC issue arrest warrants about it? 😉

[-] solo@slrpnk.net 11 points 9 months ago

CNN claiming this as an exclusive is madness

That's an excellent point you're making

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] otter@lemmy.ca 25 points 9 months ago

More links

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ggpe3qj6wo

https://apnews.com/article/icc-khan-netanyahu-070941d21ccd1f2b9611032b88527575

Karim Khan said that he believes Netanyahu, his defense minister Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders — Yehia Sinwar, Mohammed Deif and Ismail Haniyeh — are responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip and Israel.

The prosecutor must request the warrants from a pre-trial panel of three judges, who take on average two months to consider the evidence and determine if the proceedings can move forward.

Israel is not a member of the court, and even if the arrest warrants are issued, Netanyahu and Gallant do not face any immediate risk of prosecution. But Khan’s announcement deepens Israel’s isolation as it presses ahead with its war, and the threat of arrest could make it difficult for the Israeli leaders to travel abroad.

Both Sinwar and Deif are believed to be hiding in Gaza as Israel tries to hunt them down. But Haniyeh, the supreme leader of the Islamic militant group, is based in Qatar and frequently travels across the region.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

“Let me be clear,” the president said in the statement, “whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence – none – between Israel and Hamas.”

Biden saying the right things as usual. /s

[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago

It's true. Hamas is posting rookie numbers. They've got to up their death count by around 10x before they can be in Israel's league.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 19 points 9 months ago

They've already called it antisemitic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

You mean "they did it first" doesn't hold up in international court?

[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Oh boy, I can’t wait to see the reactions of politicians of the “free world” that prevented anyone to say anything against Israel for years on the pretext of antisemitism.

Especially that useless POS of Emanuel Macron, our infamous president.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
988 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41221 readers
3748 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS