494
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Cant have users getting all uppity with excess memory after all

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I mean. It makes sense. The vast majority of people buying apple computers are loyalists or people that simply need an Internet/word processor.

And if you want to develop in apple then you have to spend a massive premium for their higher end hardware.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I'll admit I don't use Macs, so maybe they are more efficient than the Linux and windows machines I work off...

...but I typically use machines with 64GB and recently upgraded my personal machine to 128GB. I still swap about 50GB to my SSD from time to time.

And I'm not doing heavy graphic design or movie editing stuff.

I cannot fathom for the life of me how 8GB would ever be feasible.

[-] Specal@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's worth mentioning that windows will use as much ram as possible just because it can and leave available with what it considers "reasonable"

[-] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Do you understand kernel memory management fundamentals? I'm asking because what you wrote here strongly suggests otherwise - so, unless you're able to show me I'm wrong, I'm going to stick with my conclusion that this is all incorrect and likely complete bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] egeres@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I can't believe I'm reading this in 2024

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

I haven't used 8GB since... 2008 or so? TBF, I'm a power user (as are most people on any Lemmy instance, I presume), but still...

And sure, Mac OS presumably uses less RAM than Windows, but all the applications don't.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what a weird title bro, of course they argue in favor of it, they sell the fucking hardware that they created. Be a little weird if they just argued against it after spending billions designing and manufacturing it.

Regardless, i still can't believe apple thought 8GB minimum was ok, genuinely baffling to me.

[-] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

It's okay if you run efficient OS on it, not the case.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

OSX is waaaay more memory efficient than windows…

[-] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah my blueprint of efficient os it isn't Windows also.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And it’s not RAM, it’s UM for an SoC. The usage of memory changed with the introduction of Apple Silicon.

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Apple has been really stretching their takes lately. Nice to see some fire under their ass though it's not going to matter. Too many ignorant people falling for likeable propaganda.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
494 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS