170
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Israel ordered its state-run electricity company to halt supply to the Gaza Strip on Saturday after the Palestinian militant group Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel, the energy minister said.

“I have signed an order instructing (Israel) Electric Company to stop the electricity supply to Gaza,” Energy Minister Israel Katz said in a statement.

At least 150 Israelis have been killed in the attacks launched by the Palestinian movement Hamas.

Israel said the Iran-backed group had declared war as its army confirmed fighting with militants in several Israeli towns and military bases near Gaza and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to retaliate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 71 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This type of collective punishment against civilians is a war crime.

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago

I don't think this is a "punishment." It seems rather foolish to expect them to supply electricity to the people actively using the electricity to kill their civillians.

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago

"to the people actively using electricity to kill their civilians"

Right. So you're telling me they have data analysts that can precisely tell which buildings are occupied by hamas and which are occupied by civilians. You know, intel that would be worth a fortune for them considering that's kinda their enemy and it would be an incredible chance to get rid of them once and for all. Notwithstanding the fact that they'd have to have the ability to individually toggle electricity for every building, which, I have a feeling, does not in fact work that way.

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

Allow me to clarify.

Their first priority is to stop their citizens from dying.

If they need to cut off electricity to terrorists to do that, they will. If they need to cut off electricity to whole regions of the Gaza strip, or the Gaza strip altogether, to keep their people safe, they will.

More targeted enforcement would be preferred. Sure. But that's not what I said was happening.

You know, intel that would be worth a fortune for them considering that’s kinda their enemy and it would be an incredible chance to get rid of them once and for all.

Fun fact, Israel is very good at intel. Israel can often find which building are occupied by Hamas.

Fun fact, Hamas enjoys operating from, and firing rockets from, civilian homes, mosques, hospitals, and schools. Here's a handy list: https://kbin.social/m/Israel/t/368817/A-handy-list-of-sources-describing-where-Hamas-produces-stores

One of Israel's greatest challenges is finding ways to stop terrorism given this unfortunate reality. They develop technology to try to detect civilian presence in these buildings, and to, in case they miss anybody, warn the civilians and give them time to evacuate.

[-] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

There is no civilian infrastructure in a concentration camp. There are no civilians in a concentration camp.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Not having that data is exactly the point, if they had that sure they could specifically cut power. But they don't have that, and Hamas is mixing with civilians, so they're forced to cut power across the board

[-] georgette@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I might be wrong here, but i don't think Hannah is using Tesla cannons to bomb Israel. How exactly does electricity factor into their plans?

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure how Hamas makes and fires its current rockets, but I imagine there are at least lightbulbs involved in their process.

[-] kitonthenet@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

expect them to supply electricity to the people actively using the electricity to kill their civillians.

The second half of your comment refutes the first

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

what? how so? Are you saying you do expect them to help Hamas kill Israeli civilians? Is "not being allowed to kill Israeli civilians" a form of punishment, to you?

[-] kitonthenet@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

By all accounts the attacks are over, what’s left are reprisals

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

I heard Israel declared war. It would be odd to deliver electricity to your enemy. Other campaigns target power plants. Short of expecting Israel to bomb their own plants, I would expect them to simply cut power if they can. Not saying they should, just pointing out it's a common thing in war.

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

oh, for how many hours have the attacks been over? How many of the hostages were returned safely?

Israel has said it has fought off a majority of the militants—not that it as fought them all off.

there is no reason to think the attacks are over. There's no reason to think they won't come back with more rockets in an hour or two, let alone tomorrow.

there certainly wasn't any reason to think attacks were over back when Israel made the call to cut power.

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago
[-] kitonthenet@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

no water, that’s not a reprisal? medical care compromised by no power, if you’re into reprisals I think you should say it, but until now you’ve been entirely dishonest about it

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

so are you still standing by your claim that the attacks are over? should I continue to cite attacks as they happen? or are you going to admit that the attacks are ongoing?

Medical care is compromised by the lack of power. The reason Israel cut off power was not to compromise medical care. The reason Israel cut off power was a military strategy to impede production and firing of rockets. I already pointed that out, but you've been entirely dishonest about it. You'll ignore the point again in your next comment, won't you?

You linked to a live thread, not to a source specific to water. I managed to find one bullet point on that page about a siege that covers water. I don't think siege warfare is generally viewed as a form of reprisal. From what I understand, starvation is generally illegal under most treaties, but requires a "high degree of deprivation.". From what I understand, Gaza is near water, and has access to food and water both internally, via Egypt, via its sea border, etc., etc. So... meh. We'll see if it actually plays out as a starvation tactic, versus a tactic to shut down supply to enemy combatants and rocket manufacturing.

[-] crashoverride@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Maybe Israel should have consider that before declaring the people of Palestine, as a whole second class citizens and slaves and erected a part-time between the two. Fuck israel and I hope they die

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

The people of Palestine are not second-class citizens of Israel, they are first-class citizens of Palestine. There is only one level of citizenship in Israel, and all citizens are afforded the full rights of any citizen. Every concession Israel offered the Palestinians was either rejected or used as an opportunity to ramp up terrorism. Look up the Olmert deal. Look up the withdrawal from Gaza. Look up the god damn Peel commission. We've constantly been vying for peace, and we've constantly been made to regret it.

There is no slavery in Israel or Palestine. There is no "a part-time" either. If you're gonna make up antisemitic lies, the least you could do is check your damn speech-to-text.

Fuck you, I hope you don't die, I hope you learn the vile nature of your lies and hate and the ashes they leave on your mouth cause you to grow the fuck up.

[-] jadalovelace@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

every concession Israel offered was a joke. Which was also affirmed by the US, the EU, and the UN. Why did you conveniently forgot how this trio, (together with an at the time still sort of sane Russia) proposed The Roadmap For Peace, which required Israel to stop building new settlements in Palestinian areas - but Israel said no. because fuck the Palestinians.

the Olmert deal was opposed by the israelis themselves. and the Palestinians said no, because the Olmert deal was a unilateral action by Israel. the Palestinians wanted to follow the plan that the EU, US, and UN proposed.

the Peel commission? the one from 1937 you mean? you're joking right? you had to reach almost a century into the past to find an example that fit your narrative? never mind that everyone involved in that time is long dead.

you are spreading bullshit propaganda. Israel is an apartheid state and has been indiscriminantly killing Palestinians year after year.

load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
170 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48183 readers
1909 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS