532
So 5 stars then (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

got confused enough that I believe this should have been written this way:

In the interest of accuracy, the [reviewer] above is one of my client’s ex-spouse whom we won a case from.

[-] T4V0@lemmy.pt 5 points 4 days ago

You're thinking too hard about this, the lawyer left this response open ended on purpose as an ad. Regardless if the lawyer won or lost the case, the implication here is that they won, so they are so good at their job, the opposition cries about it.

[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 3 days ago

Tis the opposite, I misread the response initially.

load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
532 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

12582 readers
1038 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS