I know - you're very probably already sixteen. That's why we are here.
If you've managed to miss the coming change in the law, I envy you. This silly law has taken up several hours of my year that could have been spent doing something more productive like watching Golden Girls.
But, the law is here now and we need to take "Reasonable Steps" to ensure that everyone is over sixteen. If you are wondering what "reasonable steps" is, then join the club. Nobody really knows. What I do know is that we have to start to make an effort to be sure that no young'uns are here against the law.
To that end, we have hired a helpful bot called Molly. She's an expert at being sixteen and she's just been told that it's her job is to verify all your ages. Here she is:
What's next? Well, in the first phase we ask that you drop her a Message that verifies you are over 16. She doesn't want to see your government ID. Some ideas that she would accept are:
- A passenger takes a photo of your username on a sheet of paper with you driving (please don't make this one a selfie). Faces not required.
- A photo of your username with a glass of alcohol at a bar.
- A convincing spiel that would only come from someone older than sixteen (Can you tell Molly who Samantha is?). Can you tell her about the Breakfast Club that only 70's/80's kids from Queensland would know?
- Anything else you can think of that only someone over sixteen could/would do.
There's no need to spend a lot of time on this. At this point, I'll go through the users who have messaged her and compile a list of people who have verified their age. You can be creative. Just be aware that there's an infinitesimal chance (but not zero) that whatever you send may be sent to some government agency to demonstrate that we are complying with the law.
Frequently Asked Questions:
- How do you know that the user isn't faking their submission? I don't. No method is perfect, we saw kids defeating intricate and expensive verification systems earlier this year. Kids are smart.
- How do you stop a kid from moving their account to one of the thousands of non-Australian Lemmy Instances and just continuing on with their day? I can't. The fact that the law is totally ineffectual in the context of Lemmy is beside the point. We clearly meet the definition of a Social Media platform according to the law, and we are based in Australia. So we have to comply, even if it is pointless.
- Are you aware that this is pointless and kids are going to get around it? I know that teenage-me sure would have. But again, that's beside the point. We need to comply with the law.
- Will you accept a photo of me in my undies? Ok, this one isn't frequent from previous discussions on the law, but I wanted to include it in case. Please don't send NSFW photos to show you are over age.
On that front, we're a little fortunate. One of the whitepapers I saw on the legislation essentially spruiked a whole industry poised to offer sites 'age verification services'. By getting in ahead of all that and verifying our users using methods our own users themselves define, we're avoiding that noise.
And the users have been wonderful. I've always loved the support of this crowd and they haven't let us down on this matter, either. By simply leaving it with you all to go ahead and define your own verification means, you've come up with loads of unique stuff that I would never have thought of. And by keeping it all funnelled to DMs the way we have, no AI is going to learn anything from you.
If we are singled out to demonstrate that we took reasonable steps, I'd love to present the evidence that we have complied with the legislation. They can't complain that our methods fail to meet some standard, as they haven't provided a standard. I honestly believe I could go all the way to court with the messages that you've sent in as "any reasonable person would believe this was sent by someone over sixteen". If that turns into some sort of thing that goes 'ok, you need to do x to verify ages in future', we've beaten all such changes by being grandfathered in on our own system.
I'd love for you to share the de-identified messages. We're a clever bunch here and I'd love to see how we all responded.
Maybe a few of them and after a bit. I can't think of any examples so far of two people doing the same thing, but I also don't want to take dozens of means off the table for future respondents. One user already shared his genius method, and I suppose that method is still available for others to use. ๐
There is no way some other lazy person hasn't done the same thing I did.